1990
DOI: 10.2343/geochemj.24.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of organic acid in the abiogenic reduction of sulfate and the sulfur isotope effect.

Abstract: Abiogenic reduction of sulfate by acetic acid has been conducted at temperatures ranging from 241 to 340°C. The sulfides produced and the remaining sulfates have been chemically and isotopically quan tified. The reaction of the aqueous sulfate reduction obey first-order kinetics. The rate constants are strongly dependent on temperature. The temperature dependence of the reaction rate (min-') is given by the following rate law: log k=-10.3 x 103/T+15.1. The activation energy for the reaction of sulfate reductio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
85
4
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
85
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this trend is consistent with the results of abiogenic reduction of sulfate reported by Kiyosu (1980) and Kiyosu and Krouse (1990). However, the O34S values of the sulfur com pounds are fairly variable compared with those previously reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, this trend is consistent with the results of abiogenic reduction of sulfate reported by Kiyosu (1980) and Kiyosu and Krouse (1990). However, the O34S values of the sulfur com pounds are fairly variable compared with those previously reported.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The rate constants (per minute) for the temperature of 223 to 270°C vary from 5.4x 10-5 to 6.8 x10-4 (mina-'), respectively. Kiyosu and Krouse (1990) reported first-order constants for the reduction of sulfuric acid by acetic acid over the same temperature range of 2.2 x 10-6 to 1.4 x l0-4 (min.-'), which are slightly smaller than the values obtained for the present experi ment. …”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations