2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of ‘no-touch’ automated room disinfection systems in infection prevention and control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
120
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(141 reference statements)
1
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…53 This may have implications for automated room disinfection systems using UV radiation. 54 To the authors' knowledge, no studies have evaluated the impact of hydrogenperoxide-based automated room disinfection systems against biofilms, although emerging data suggest that liquid hydrogen peroxide, as an oxidizing agent, targets both the biofilm matrix and microbes in the biofilm. 35 Aside from the inactivation of microbes attached to surfaces, the chemical properties of biocides also seem to be important in terms of preventing, promoting or dismantling biofilms.…”
Section: Biocide Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…53 This may have implications for automated room disinfection systems using UV radiation. 54 To the authors' knowledge, no studies have evaluated the impact of hydrogenperoxide-based automated room disinfection systems against biofilms, although emerging data suggest that liquid hydrogen peroxide, as an oxidizing agent, targets both the biofilm matrix and microbes in the biofilm. 35 Aside from the inactivation of microbes attached to surfaces, the chemical properties of biocides also seem to be important in terms of preventing, promoting or dismantling biofilms.…”
Section: Biocide Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface-attached cells and biofilms are clearly not the only reason for failures in hospital disinfection, given the difficulty in achieving adequate distribution and contact time using manual methods. 11,13,54,58 However, both reduced biocide susceptibility (Table I) and increasing resilience to physical removal by cleaning are likely to contribute to failures in hospital cleaning. This could partly explain why disinfectants that are effective for the inactivation of planktonic bacteria in laboratory tests are not effective for the eradication of a considerably lower load of the same bacterial species from hospital surfaces.…”
Section: Physical Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence of chloroxylenol and isopropyl alcohol in dettol [21] and cinnamaldehyde and eugenol in cinnamon oil [22,23] inhibits the growth of bacterial isolates. Although different disinfection strategies including the application of isopropyl alcohol or ethyl alcohol [24,17] and ultraviolet radiation [25] were reported earlier, but ultraviolet radiation [26] is not so effective against a wide array of microbes.…”
Section: Biofilm Formation By Staphylococcus Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He outlined the rationale for considering an NTD system; principally the 'prior room occupancy' data combined with the fact that conventional methods do not reliably eliminate pathogens (Otter et al, 2013b). Several different NTD systems are available (mainly hydrogen peroxide vapour or aerosol, and ultraviolet C or pulsed-xenon), each with advantages and disadvantages (Otter et al, 2013c). Technology can help, but you need to understand the limitations.…”
Section: Medical Stats With Tim Boswellmentioning
confidence: 99%