2014
DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2014.994543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of new media in sustaining the status quo: online political expression, nationalism, and system support in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, Weibo is expected to provide information that undermines the effect of CCP-led nationalist propaganda, which reduces support for the current political system. Previous studies on the democratic potential of social media in China have focused on two competing views, one of which stresses the democratizing effect of social media (Cairns & Carlson, 2016), and the other emphasizes the quick adaptation of the CCP to the social media environment and its efforts to use the new media to its own advantage (Hyun et al, 2014;Hyun & Kim, 2015). However, recent studies have demonstrated that the political information available on Weibo is more diverse than that on traditional state-led mass media (Rauchfleisch & Sch€ afer, 2015;Stockmann & Luo, 2017) and that Chinese citizens can still read grievances and critical opinions on Weibo (Qin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, Weibo is expected to provide information that undermines the effect of CCP-led nationalist propaganda, which reduces support for the current political system. Previous studies on the democratic potential of social media in China have focused on two competing views, one of which stresses the democratizing effect of social media (Cairns & Carlson, 2016), and the other emphasizes the quick adaptation of the CCP to the social media environment and its efforts to use the new media to its own advantage (Hyun et al, 2014;Hyun & Kim, 2015). However, recent studies have demonstrated that the political information available on Weibo is more diverse than that on traditional state-led mass media (Rauchfleisch & Sch€ afer, 2015;Stockmann & Luo, 2017) and that Chinese citizens can still read grievances and critical opinions on Weibo (Qin et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, it was expected that new media would provide alternative information to Chinese citizens, which would eventually nullify the Chinese government's nationalistic propaganda efforts (Cairns & Carlson, 2016). On the other hand, it was argued that the CCP had already adapted to the new media ecology, and it manipulated the new media in its favor by tightening information control and boosting the efficiency of nationalistic propaganda, thus successfully maintaining the status quo of the current political system (Hyun et al, 2014;Hyun & Kim, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scarce, seminal research has helped identify how some governments use social media to limit social action by censoring dialogues that imply social mobilization or citizen organizing (Engesser et al, 2017;Ernst et al, 2017;Hyun & Kim, 2015;King et al, 2013;Williams et al, 2013).…”
Section: Social Media As a State-control Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yiben also states that the Chinese government has adopted a ‘strategic approach’ in dealing with online popular nationalism, letting its citizens air their grievances online while also being careful to curtail these sentiments whenever social instability is at risk ( ibid .). Recent research points to the success of this approach, suggesting that public use of the internet for political expression sustains rather than challenges the political status quo (Ki and Kim ).…”
Section: Framing Everyday Nationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%