“…Participants tended to accurately judge the bad explanations as less satisfying than the good ones, but they also judged that explanations containing irrelevant neuroscience language were more satisfying, particularly the bad ones (Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008 ). Although neuroscience information is not seductive in all circumstances (Diekmann, König, & Alles, 2015 ; Scurich & Shniderman, 2014 ), this effect has been replicated both directly (Fernandez-Duque, Evans, Christian, & Hodges, 2015 ; Weisberg, Taylor, & Hopkins, 2015 ) and conceptually (Rhodes, Rodriguez, & Shah, 2014 ). Additionally, similar effects have been found in other domains.…”