2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of nest surface temperatures and the brain in influencing ant metabolic rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A minimum of 15 individual ants were collected from each site between April and May 2014, and then held at 25C for two hours to avoid effects of time of day of capture differences along the gradient. Previous work on I. purpureus found no effect of time of day of capture/ nest temperature on thermal tolerances (determined via thermolimit respirometry) from a single site (Andrew et al 2016).…”
Section: Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A minimum of 15 individual ants were collected from each site between April and May 2014, and then held at 25C for two hours to avoid effects of time of day of capture differences along the gradient. Previous work on I. purpureus found no effect of time of day of capture/ nest temperature on thermal tolerances (determined via thermolimit respirometry) from a single site (Andrew et al 2016).…”
Section: Site Selectionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Here we measured CT max and CT min by observing an individual ant's ability to right itself while temperatures were increasing at 0.25C min -1 . The calculation of critical thermal limits using ant righting behaviour may be more variable than using physiological critical limits such as upper lethal temperatures where ants are exposed to static temperatures for two hours (Andrew et al 2013a) or thermolimit respirometry where CT max is derived from metabolic measurements using flow-through CO 2based respirometry and optical detection, when temperatures are ramped at a consistent rate (Andrew et al 2016;Lighton & Turner 2004). As an alternative measure of CT max thermolimit respirometry (Lighton & Turner 2004) may be more robust, as the method explicitly measures the ceasing of metabolism (release of carbon dioxide) of the ant; but it is also a different measure of CT max , as there is no ability for the ants to recover from heat exposure in thermolimit respirometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, our previous study with S. rubrus found a temperature effect on beetle performance even though the temperatures in the experimental chambers were much lower than the CT max of S. rubrus (Holley & Andrew ), suggesting that it may be difficult to predict insect performance under climate change from thermal performance curves alone (Andrew et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At the end of both experiments, the thermolimit respirometry ( Lighton and Turner, 2004 ; Andrew et al, 2016 ) was assessed in the fifth instar of caterpillars in the exposure of lowest concentration of Spinetoram and Azadirachtin as well as their control groups. Metabolic rate, activity and water loss were measured over a 25–55°C temperature range in a water bath (Type R4, Grant Instruments, Cambridge, United Kingdom).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%