2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of negotiating tools in the environmental policy mix instruments: determinants and effects of the Environmental Agreement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis of firms in the fashion sector focused on various -dimensions‖ of competitiveness. Although quantitative data ideally should be used for measuring competitive performance, the use of self-reported data is not uncommon in the related literature (see, for instance, [71][72][73][74][75]). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis of firms in the fashion sector focused on various -dimensions‖ of competitiveness. Although quantitative data ideally should be used for measuring competitive performance, the use of self-reported data is not uncommon in the related literature (see, for instance, [71][72][73][74][75]). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, public intervention has always been required to solve environmental pollution at global and local level. The very first approach to solving environmental pollution, was originally based on mere "command and control" actions and was soon integrated with more sophisticated policy instruments (Testa et al, 2012a) that incorporated the market dynamics in their design and which have proven to be more effective in specific situations (Jaffe et al, 2002;Sterner and Isaksson, 2006;Gusmerotti et al, 2012). Such alternative approach is based on motivating mechanisms that are able to trigger actions in response to individual incentives, such as marketbased stimuli, environmental stewardships, resource (and economic) savings, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type II labels are based on self-declaration of producers, importers, distributors or retailers, while those of Type III provide quantitative environmental data on the product as the result of an independent evaluation (Horne, 2009). Voluntary tools and the use of labels derived from voluntary tools were already considered in the early 1990, as a potentially effective policy tool to allow important results to be achieved such as the acquisition of new market shares or increased market shares through the differentiation of products based on their sustainability attributes (Boer, 2003;Orsato, 2009), but without overloading companies with excessive liens and encumbrances (Blanco et al, 2009;Darnall and Sides, 2008;Gusmerotti et al, 2012;Khanna and Damon, 1999). In the last few years they have been increasingly adopted worldwide to communicate and demonstrate the sustainability of the production processes, in a more or less effective and truthful manner !…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%