The role of nature in cancer patients' lives: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis

Abstract

BackgroundA systematic review and meta-synthesis was conducted to identify, compare and synthesize the published qualitative literature contributing to our understanding of the role of nature in cancer patients’ lives.MethodAn electronic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Databases was conducted to identify qualitative studies focused on cancer patients’ nature experiences published between January 1985 and May 2015. Records were assessed according to pre-defined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on study characteristics and evaluated using the COREQ guidelines for comprehensive quality reporting. Qualitative data from ‘results’ and ‘findings’ sections were entered into data management software NVivo in order to identify recurring themes and facilitate interpretation across studies.ResultsFrom 11 eligible publications, seven inter-related core themes with descriptive themes were identified as follows: connecting with what is valued; being elsewhere, seeing and feeling differently; exploration, inner and outer excursions; home and safe; symbolism, understanding and communicating differently; benefitting from old and new physical activities; and, enriching aesthetic experiences.ConclusionsNature provides patients with unburdened physical and psychic space invested with personal significance. Findings propose nature’s role as a “secure base” offering patients a familiar and nurturing context from which new perspectives can emerge and caring connections can be made with themselves, others, the past, and the future. As such, nature supported patients to navigate the clinical and personal consequences of cancer. Comprehensive representation of cancer patients’ nature experiences identified patient values and care opportunities embedded in clinical and personal environments, which may be considered for future research and care service development.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3366-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

“Spirituality” hardly facilitates our understanding of existential distress—But “everyday life” might

“…We have learned that some patients find comfort by attaching to something outside and bigger than themselves. Typically, and hardly a surprise, the health care system can be identified as this external powerful entity, but we have also learned that creating a connection to religion or nature can contribute to experiencing safety and trust …”

A mixed-methods evaluation of a group based trail walking program to reduce anxiety in cancer survivors

“…The majority of the literature on the relationship between nature and mental health is in healthy populations and individuals who are already physically active. Little literature exists to help understand the human-nature interaction with those who have lived through experiences of ill-health and disease [8]. Preliminary investigations of nature-based interventions, such as hospital rehabilitation gardens, retreats in natural settings, and views of natural landscapes have shown potential to ease the strain and impact of diseases within a healthcare context [8].…”

“…Little literature exists to help understand the human-nature interaction with those who have lived through experiences of ill-health and disease [8]. Preliminary investigations of nature-based interventions, such as hospital rehabilitation gardens, retreats in natural settings, and views of natural landscapes have shown potential to ease the strain and impact of diseases within a healthcare context [8]. Understanding cancer survivor's perspective of how nature contributes to their recovery will better help identify intervention to address the unique challenges that cancer survivors encounter [8].…”

Nature-based care opportunities and barriers in oncology contexts: a modified international e-Delphi survey

“…This Delphi study solicited input from relevant healthcare and design experts drawn from a range of professional and academic roles (including cancer-specific experts) and explored their critical input important for the provision of beneficial and safe nature engagement in oncology contexts. Following a systematic literature 16 review, to our best knowledge, this is the first collection and synthesis of expert opinion on this topic across healthcare and design disciplines.…”