Abstract:S ustaining innovation is a vital yet difficult task. Innovation requires the coordinated efforts of many actors to facilitate (1) the recombination of ideas to generate novelty, (2) real-time problem solving, and (3) linkages between present innovation efforts with past experiences and future aspirations. We propose that innovation narratives are cultural mechanisms that address these coordination requirements by enabling translation. Specifically, innovation narratives are powerful mechanisms for translating… Show more
“…Synthesizing across these observations, we offer narratives of innovation as intra-active boundary objects as one way to benefit from the substance-process duality as applied to innovations and organizations. Narratives of innovation can be simultaneously coherent and plastic, thereby offering the means for actors with different perspectives to intra-act with one another and with material artifacts (Bartel & Garud, 2009;Garud, Simpson, Langley, & Tsoukas, 2015). The presence of multiple narratives of innovation creates a "meshwork" of discourses and activities within and across organizations (Czarniawska, 2013).…”
Section: How Might We View Innovations and Organizations As Interrelamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To garner organizational support, intrapreneurs (a term used by Pinchot, 1991, to allude to entrepreneurs within corporations) offer innovation-narratives that resonate with multiple stakeholders. This task is accomplished by crafting innovation-narratives that build upon and yet depart from what is known (Bartel & Garud, 2009). Overall, the accumulation of innovation-narratives covering both successes and failures reduces the likelihood of fragmentation or stasis.…”
Section: How Might We View Innovations and Organizations As Interrelamentioning
“…Synthesizing across these observations, we offer narratives of innovation as intra-active boundary objects as one way to benefit from the substance-process duality as applied to innovations and organizations. Narratives of innovation can be simultaneously coherent and plastic, thereby offering the means for actors with different perspectives to intra-act with one another and with material artifacts (Bartel & Garud, 2009;Garud, Simpson, Langley, & Tsoukas, 2015). The presence of multiple narratives of innovation creates a "meshwork" of discourses and activities within and across organizations (Czarniawska, 2013).…”
Section: How Might We View Innovations and Organizations As Interrelamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To garner organizational support, intrapreneurs (a term used by Pinchot, 1991, to allude to entrepreneurs within corporations) offer innovation-narratives that resonate with multiple stakeholders. This task is accomplished by crafting innovation-narratives that build upon and yet depart from what is known (Bartel & Garud, 2009). Overall, the accumulation of innovation-narratives covering both successes and failures reduces the likelihood of fragmentation or stasis.…”
Section: How Might We View Innovations and Organizations As Interrelamentioning
“…Although first and second-generation stories appear to be essentially different they share similar epistemologies. Stories are boundary objects that resonate with and between multiple audiences (Bartel andGarud, 2009: Wry et al, 2001 Collective identity stories are verbal or written expressions employed by a group of entrepreneurial actors to help project an image of themselves, collectively, as a coherent category with a meaningful label and identity (Wry et al, 2011:450). As with stories at the organizational level, collective identity stories offer ready-made constructions of credibility, appropriateness, and viability and serve as touchstones for audience assessments of legitimacy.…”
Section: Reviewing Form and Structure In Entrepreneur Storiesmentioning
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to explore the under researched interface between entrepreneur and family business stories and in particular the form and structure of second-generation entrepreneur stories. It illustrates how second-generation entrepreneur stories can be (co)authored to narrate an alternative entrepreneurial identity within a family business setting.
Design/methodology/approach
– From a desk based review of relevant literature a number of conceptual storyline models are developed and these are used to better understand second-generation entrepreneur/family business stories.
Findings
– The authorial process allows individual family members the freedom to craft contingent stories which fit their circumstances. The paper also examines the research process of co-authoring research with respondents and how this adds value to the process. The findings are mainly relevant to theory building.
Research limitations/implications
– There are obvious limitations to the study in that the conceptual model is only compared against one second-generation entrepreneur story and that clearly further research must be conducted to establish the veracity of the storyline models developed.
Practical implications
– There are some very practical implications in relation to conflict resolution within family businesses in that the storying process allows individuals the freedom to author their own stories and place in family and family business history.
Originality/value
– This paper highlights the contribution that an understanding of the interface between entrepreneur and family business stories can bring to understanding this complex dynamic.
“…These representational forms allowed for "telescoping" to the future, leveraging heterogeneous knowledge in the networks. 31 Thus, each company could reflect on its competences against jointly revealed future prospects while protecting its technology development. For example, an industrial equipment firm explored the opportunities of carbon fiber by watching other participant companies experiment in the Opportunity Creation in Innovation Networks: Interactive Revealing Practices emerging area without knowing their future intent nor the details of how their results were generated.…”
Section: Context Interacting While Protecting Problems And/or Solutionsmentioning
Innovating in networks with partners that have diverse knowledge is challenging. The challenges stem from the fact that the commonly used knowledge protection mechanisms often are neither available nor suitable in early stage exploratory collaborations. This article focuses on how company participants in heterogeneous industry networks share private knowledge while protecting firm-specific appropriation. We go beyond the prevailing strategic choice perspectives to discuss interactive revealing practices that sustain joint opportunity creation in the fragile phase of early network formation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.