1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199709)14:6<585::aid-mar4>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of motivated reasoning in vendor consideration

Abstract: This is a conceptual article dealing with the role of motivated reasoning in vendor selection. The authors argue that organizational buyers' motivated reasoning, along with the task characteristics of perceived importance and familiarity, plays an important role in determining whether an open or a closed consideration will be used for vendor selection. Based on the relationship between motivated reasoning and task characteristics, the authors develop several propositions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Buyers are more likely to adopt a cognitively less demanding, noncompensatory approach by taking short‐cuts in their search and evaluation effort”. According to Park et al (1997), uncertainty in a buying situation has been found to trigger biased decision making and use of subjectivity. Stereotyping helps to simplify the various factors that an industrial buyer would need to consider in choosing an overseas vendor.…”
Section: Vendor Selection and Iso 9000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buyers are more likely to adopt a cognitively less demanding, noncompensatory approach by taking short‐cuts in their search and evaluation effort”. According to Park et al (1997), uncertainty in a buying situation has been found to trigger biased decision making and use of subjectivity. Stereotyping helps to simplify the various factors that an industrial buyer would need to consider in choosing an overseas vendor.…”
Section: Vendor Selection and Iso 9000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biases described by Kunda that result from the differing motivations of accuracy versus directional goals seem in many ways similar to the way that people who are high or low on impulsivity would differ from each other. Motivated reasoning has been applied to a wide range of topics, including stereotyping , health-related persuasion (Keller & Block, 1999), depth of processing (Jain & Maheswaran, 2000), and vendor considerations (Park, Sohi, Marquardt, 1997). However, researchers have rarely examined how personality and individual differences might moderate motivation.…”
Section: Impulsivitymentioning
confidence: 99%