Proceedings of MILCOM '96 IEEE Military Communications Conference
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.1996.569422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of modeling and simulation in sizing military networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a reasonable consensus that OPNET is the communication modeling tool of choice for the military (Refs. 2,6,9,10,11,12). Moreover, because the Army uses multiple communication systems, including Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS), Enhanced Position Location Reporting System (EPLRS), Mobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE), asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), and satellite communications that must interface into an efficient network of networks, simulation is required "early and often" as the title of a recent article in Signal (Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a reasonable consensus that OPNET is the communication modeling tool of choice for the military (Refs. 2,6,9,10,11,12). Moreover, because the Army uses multiple communication systems, including Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCGARS), Enhanced Position Location Reporting System (EPLRS), Mobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE), asynchronous transfer mode (ATM), and satellite communications that must interface into an efficient network of networks, simulation is required "early and often" as the title of a recent article in Signal (Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%