Abstract:Climate warming and shifts in precipitation regimes are particularly strong in arctic and subarctic regions (IPCC, 2013), causing thawing of permafrost and the formation of small water basins (Bouchard et al., 2014; O'Donnell et al., 2012). These thaw (thermokarst) lakes and ponds are ubiquitous in the permafrost landscape and hotspots for carbon dioxide (CO 2) and methane (CH 4) emissions (Holgerson & Raymond, 2016;
“…External delivery of CH 4 may be more likely to cause the differences in observed CH 4 concentrations. Dissolved CH 4 might enter the lake from the adjacent permafrost plateau active layer (Pacheco et al 2014; Olid et al 2021) or may be produced at and transported from the permafrost interface (Walter et al 2006) to the lake sediments. In either case, CH 4 produced and emitted from the thaw edge would be sourced from older, more recently thawed permafrost carbon.…”
Methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from small peatland lakes may be highly sensitive to climate warming and thermokarst expansion caused by permafrost thaw. We studied effects of thermokarst expansion on ebullitive CH4 and CO2 fluxes and diffusive CH4 fluxes from a peatland thaw lake in boreal western Canada. Ebullitive CH4 fluxes from the thaw edge (236 ± 61 mg CH4 m−2 d−1) were double and quadruple that of the stable lake edge and center, respectively. Modeled diffusive CH4 fluxes did not differ between the thawing and stable edges (~ 50 mg CH4 m−2 d−1) but were double that of the center. Radiocarbon (14C) analysis of CH4 and CO2 bubbles from the thaw edge was older (~ 1211 and 1420 14C yr BP) than from the stable edge and the center (modern to ~ 102 and 50 14C yr BP, respectively). Incubations indicated that deep, old peat sediment was more labile along the thaw edge than in the center. While our study suggested increase CH4 emissions partly derived from millennial‐aged carbon along the thaw edge, accounting for these emissions only increased the estimated total lake CH4 emissions by ~ 10%, which is a much smaller contribution than measured from thermokarst lakes in yedoma regions. Our study suggests that it is important to account for landscape history and lake types when studying the processes that govern the sensitivity of lake greenhouse gas emissions to climate change.
“…External delivery of CH 4 may be more likely to cause the differences in observed CH 4 concentrations. Dissolved CH 4 might enter the lake from the adjacent permafrost plateau active layer (Pacheco et al 2014; Olid et al 2021) or may be produced at and transported from the permafrost interface (Walter et al 2006) to the lake sediments. In either case, CH 4 produced and emitted from the thaw edge would be sourced from older, more recently thawed permafrost carbon.…”
Methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from small peatland lakes may be highly sensitive to climate warming and thermokarst expansion caused by permafrost thaw. We studied effects of thermokarst expansion on ebullitive CH4 and CO2 fluxes and diffusive CH4 fluxes from a peatland thaw lake in boreal western Canada. Ebullitive CH4 fluxes from the thaw edge (236 ± 61 mg CH4 m−2 d−1) were double and quadruple that of the stable lake edge and center, respectively. Modeled diffusive CH4 fluxes did not differ between the thawing and stable edges (~ 50 mg CH4 m−2 d−1) but were double that of the center. Radiocarbon (14C) analysis of CH4 and CO2 bubbles from the thaw edge was older (~ 1211 and 1420 14C yr BP) than from the stable edge and the center (modern to ~ 102 and 50 14C yr BP, respectively). Incubations indicated that deep, old peat sediment was more labile along the thaw edge than in the center. While our study suggested increase CH4 emissions partly derived from millennial‐aged carbon along the thaw edge, accounting for these emissions only increased the estimated total lake CH4 emissions by ~ 10%, which is a much smaller contribution than measured from thermokarst lakes in yedoma regions. Our study suggests that it is important to account for landscape history and lake types when studying the processes that govern the sensitivity of lake greenhouse gas emissions to climate change.
“…We also refitted this model using solid peat at the bottom of the active layer as a terrestrial DIC source instead of shallow groundwater DOC. Peatland soils can also export large quantities of CH 4 to fluvial networks, especially from anaerobic conditions in the active layer (Campeau et al, 2014;Dinsmore et al, 2010;Olid et al, 2021 but see Street et al, 2016). This CH 4 can then be made available for autotrophic growth by methane-oxidizing bacteria (Grey, 2016;Kohzu et al, 2004;Raghoebarsing et al, 2005).…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Resource Use By Aquatic Primary Producersmentioning
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri bution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
“…During summer, groundwater discharge is highly relevant at the peak of active layer thaw, when the flow in rivers is at its minima. Therefore, most of the CH 4 found in Arctic rivers and streams during summer may have originated from deeper soil layers, thus, sustaining the summer aquatic CH 4 emissions (Figures 2 and 3) (Connolly et al., 2020; van Grinsven et al., 2021; Harms et al., 2020; Olid et al., 2021). Because we did not measure the concentration of CH 4 just above the river bed, we could not account for the potential CH 4 efflux from anoxic hyporheic sediments into the water column.…”
When organic matter from thawed permafrost is released, the sources and sinks of greenhouse gases (GHGs), like carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) in Arctic rivers will be influenced in the future. However, the temporal variation, environmental controls, and magnitude of the Arctic riverine GHGs are largely unknown. We measured in situ high temporal resolution concentrations of CO2, CH4, and oxygen (O2) in the Ambolikha River in northeast Siberia between late June and early August 2019. During this period, the largely supersaturated riverine CO2 and CH4 concentrations decreased steadily by 90% and 78%, respectively, while the O2 concentrations increased by 22% and were driven by the decreasing water temperature. Estimated gas fluxes indicate that during late June 2019, significant emissions of CO2 and CH4 were sustained, possibly by external terrestrial sources during flooding, or due to lateral exchange with gas‐rich downstream‐flowing water. In July and early August, the river reversed its flow constantly and limited the water exchange at the site. The composition of dissolved organic matter and microbial communities analyzed in discrete samples also revealed a temporal shift. Furthermore, the cumulative total riverine CO2 emissions (36.8 gC‐CO2 m−2) were nearly five times lower than the CO2 uptake at the adjacent floodplain. Emissions of riverine CH4 (0.21 gC‐CH4 m−2) were 16 times lower than the floodplain CH4 emissions. Our study revealed that the hydraulic connectivity with the land in the late freshet, and reversing flow directions in Arctic streams in summer, regulate riverine carbon replenishment and emissions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.