2010
DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2010.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of mediodorsal thalamus in temporal differentiation of reward-guided actions

Abstract: The mediodorsal thalamus (MD) is a crucial component of the neural network involved in the learning and generation of goal-directed actions. A series of experiments reported here examined the contributions of MD to the temporal differentiation of reward-guided actions. In Experiment 1, we trained rats on a discrete-trial, fixed-criterion temporal differentiation task, in which only lever presses exceeding a threshold duration value were rewarded. Pre-training MD lesions impaired temporal differentiation of act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A two-way ANOVA revealed no interaction between criterion duration and session (F (2, 8) ϭ 1.97, p Ͼ 0.05), a main effect of duration (F (1,8) , p Ͻ 0.001), and a main effect of session (F (1,8) , p Ͻ 0.001). As shown in Figure 1 D, in accord with previous work (Platt et al, 1973;Yin, 2009;Yu et al, 2010), the median duration approached the criterion duration with training. As the duration requirement increased, the mice also failed more often, producing more prematurely released lever presses (percentage of correct trials: Ͼ400 ms, 52 Ϯ 4%; Ͼ800 ms, 39 Ϯ 4%; Ͼ1600 ms, 28 Ϯ 3%).…”
Section: Trainingsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A two-way ANOVA revealed no interaction between criterion duration and session (F (2, 8) ϭ 1.97, p Ͼ 0.05), a main effect of duration (F (1,8) , p Ͻ 0.001), and a main effect of session (F (1,8) , p Ͻ 0.001). As shown in Figure 1 D, in accord with previous work (Platt et al, 1973;Yin, 2009;Yu et al, 2010), the median duration approached the criterion duration with training. As the duration requirement increased, the mice also failed more often, producing more prematurely released lever presses (percentage of correct trials: Ͼ400 ms, 52 Ϯ 4%; Ͼ800 ms, 39 Ϯ 4%; Ͼ1600 ms, 28 Ϯ 3%).…”
Section: Trainingsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Animals can modify action timing through experience with feedback (Platt et al, 1973;Yin, 2009;Yu et al, 2010), but the neural mechanisms underlying such learning remain poorly understood (Mita et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On each trial, to earn a piece of food reward, the mouse must produce an action of a minimum duration [32,33]. The lever is transiently retracted after release, and a reward is delivered if the press duration exceeded the criterion duration.…”
Section: Neural Activity Related To Action Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle tension is sensed by the Golgi tendon organs, which send Ib afferents representing the negative feedback for the force control system. In this connection, it is worth noting that increased stiffness in skeletal muscles is also observed in Parkinson's patients, as a result [33,35]. Mice must press a lever and hold it down for a minimum amount of time in order to earn a food pellet.…”
Section: Lower Levels For Motor Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limbic and associative networks overlap, especially in regions such as the medial prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens core, and mediodorsal thalamus (Haber, 2003;Joel & Weiner, 1994;Yin et al, 2008;Yu, Fan, Lopez, & Yin, 2012;Yu, Gupta, & Yin, 2010).…”
Section: Associative Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%