The Role of Maxillofacial Prosthetics for the Surgically Treated Patient at National Cancer Institute–Designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis The current role of maxillofacial prosthetic care for head and neck cancer patients is not well understood. Additionally, perceived barriers for service provision are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current role of maxillofacial prosthetic care at National Cancer Institute (NCI)–designated comprehensive cancer centers and to identify perceived barriers to care. Study Design Multicenter, cross‐sectional survey of head and neck division leaders at NCI‐designated comprehensive cancer centers. Methods Each head and neck division leader from the 47 NCI‐designated comprehensive cancer centers was invited to participate. The main outcomes of this study were: 1) to evaluate the current role of maxillofacial prosthetics for the surgically treated head and neck cancer patient within NCI‐designated comprehensive cancer centers and 2) to identify perceived barriers to care. Measured outcomes were obtained from an anonymous online survey and reported. Results Twenty‐eight of the 47 head and neck service chiefs responded (60% response rate). Respondents expressed preference for prosthetic rehabilitation for hard palate/upper gum, auricular, and nasal defects. Local flap or free tissue transfer was preferred for lower gum and soft palate defects. Cost‐related factors were among the most reported perceived barriers to maxillofacial prosthetic care. Conclusions Maxillofacial prosthetics have an important role in the rehabilitation of the head and neck cancer patient. Perceived barriers for services exist, particularly as it relates to cost. Providers should be aware that these issues are likely to be more severe in regional or community centers. Level of Evidence NA Laryngoscope, 129:409–414, 2019

The Role of Full-Thickness Skin Grafts in Patient’s Rehabilitation after Maxillectomy and Midface Defects

“…The results of the available studies clearly prove the effectiveness of the use of obturators in patients who have undergone maxillectomy [21,22]. The main disadvantage of this solution is severe pain associated with the initial period of use.…”

Prevalence of Possible Dementia in Patients with Maxillofacial Defects and Difficulty of Inserting Obturator in Maxillectomy Patients: Toward Better Provision of Supportive Care

“…Maxillofacial prosthodontics provides prosthetic rehabilitation for functions such as speech, swallowing, mastication, and esthetics and is a well-recognized subspecialty of prosthodontics [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. In 2018, Yanagi et al conducted a study at the Clinic for Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, and found that the average age of patients had shown an increasing trend over the previous 35 years and that almost 80% of patients had developed tumors in Japan’s now super-aging society [ 4 ], and we feel that this could be even higher now.…”

“…Maxillofacial prostheses are an important tool in providing continuous supportive care to patients with maxillofacial defects, including in terminal care [ 1 , 2 ]. In other words, many patients would have difficulty surviving in daily life without their maxillofacial prosthesis [ 3 ].…”

Present and future of extraoral maxillofacial prosthodontics: Cancer rehabilitation

“…Most head and neck oncology services that want to promote this multiprofessional approach do not have the necessary in-house professionals to address the patients' broad scope of needs. Therefore, patients are often referred externally or directed to rehabilitation services remotely located (3)(4)(5)(6).…”