2016
DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2016.1192584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of maternal communication style in adolescents’ motivation to change alcohol use: A vignette-based study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

7
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our first research goal was to examine associations of parental communication style and adolescents' personal self-determination with adolescents' perceptions of the situation of regulation, in terms of autonomy satisfaction and frustration, and perceived legitimacy. In line with previous research (e.g., Baudat et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2016;see also Koestner et al, 1984), when parents attempt to regulate adolescents' behavior using a psychologically controlling communication style, which included threats of love withdrawal and guilt induction, adolescents not only tend to feel more frustrated in their need for autonomy, they also are more inclined to believe that their parents have less legitimate authority to regulate their behavior. In contrast, when parents made use of an autonomysupportive communication style, which included attempting to take the child's perspective and offering an explanation, adolescents are more likely to feel satisfied in their need for autonomy and to perceive the parents' regulation as a legitimate request, corroborating previous research (e.g., Van Petegem et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Adolescents' Perceptions: Autonomy Experiences and Legitimacysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our first research goal was to examine associations of parental communication style and adolescents' personal self-determination with adolescents' perceptions of the situation of regulation, in terms of autonomy satisfaction and frustration, and perceived legitimacy. In line with previous research (e.g., Baudat et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2016;see also Koestner et al, 1984), when parents attempt to regulate adolescents' behavior using a psychologically controlling communication style, which included threats of love withdrawal and guilt induction, adolescents not only tend to feel more frustrated in their need for autonomy, they also are more inclined to believe that their parents have less legitimate authority to regulate their behavior. In contrast, when parents made use of an autonomysupportive communication style, which included attempting to take the child's perspective and offering an explanation, adolescents are more likely to feel satisfied in their need for autonomy and to perceive the parents' regulation as a legitimate request, corroborating previous research (e.g., Van Petegem et al, 2017a).…”
Section: Adolescents' Perceptions: Autonomy Experiences and Legitimacysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Moreover, higher levels of oppositional defiance in middle and late adolescence are associated with greater maladjustment, including more internalizing and externalizing problems (e.g., Aelterman, Vansteenkiste, & Haerens, 2019) and with a sense of being alienated from one's personally valued goals and interests (Van Petegem et al, 2015b). Further, previous studies among middle adolescents have found that a controlling, relative to an autonomy-supportive, communication style by parents is associated with more adolescent oppositional defiance, both cross-sectionally (e.g., Baudat et al, 2017) and longitudinally (Vansteenkiste et al, 2014). Parental regulation as such is not consistently predictive of adolescent oppositional defiance; this association is found only when parents attempt to regulate adolescents' behavior in a controlling way (Soenens, Vansteenkiste, & Niemiec, 2009;Van Petegem et al, 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, a recent 7-item scale was used to assess whether adolescents would react through submission (Baudat et al, 2016;cf. Skinner & Zimmer-Gembeck, 2007), that is, by giving up the personal preferences, rigidly obeying to the demand, and ruminating about the situation (e.g., "I would find it difficult to think about something else"; "I would comply submissively").…”
Section: Situational Autonomy Need Satisfaction and Frustrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ex., école, consommation d'alcool) pouvait expliquer leur acceptation ou leur rejet par les adolescents (p. ex., Baudat, Zimmermann, Antonietti, & Van Petegem, 2017 ;Van Petegem, Soenens, Vansteenkiste, & Beyers, 2015 ;Van Petegem et al, 2017). Par analogie, face à des règles ou des sollicitations transmises au sein d'un climat familial contrôlant ou encore communiquées dans un style intrusif, les adolescents seraient plus enclins à dissimuler des informations.…”
Section: Le Climat Familial : Le Rôle Du Soutien Et De La Confianceunclassified