The role of mass spectrometry and related techniques in the analysis of extractable and leachable chemicals

Abstract

In addition to degradation products, impurities, and exogenous contaminants, industries such as pharmaceutical, food, and others must concern themselves with leachables. These chemicals can derive from containers and closures or migrate from labels or secondary containers and packaging to make their way into products. Identification and quantification of extractables (potential leachables) and leachables, typically trace level analytes, is a regulatory expectation intended to ensure consumer safety and product fidelity. Mass spectrometry and related techniques have played a significant role in the analysis of extractables and leachables (E&L). This review provides an overview of how mass spectrometry is used for E&L studies, primarily in the context of the pharmaceutical industry. This review includes work flows, examples of how identification and quantification is done, and the importance of orthogonal data from several different detectors. E&L analyses are driven by the need for consumer safety. These studies are expected to expand in existing areas (e.g., food, textiles, toys, etc.) and into new, currently unregulated product areas. Thus, this topic is of interest to audiences beyond just the pharmaceutical and health care industries. Finally, the potential of universal detector approaches used in other areas is suggested as an opportunity to drive E&L research progress in this arguably understudied, under‐published realm.

Plasticiser loss in heritage collections: its prevalence, cause, effect, and methods for analysis

“…Deposits formed under evaporation-controlled conditions are ideal candidates because there can be sufficient amounts of the deposit to measure [98]. Collected surface samples may be characterised by a range of spectroscopic techniques, including 1 H/ 13 C/ 31 P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), Infrared, and Raman, or chromatography-mass spectrometry techniques [16,79,[99][100][101].…”

Chemical Characterization and Non-targeted Analysis of Medical Device Extracts: A Review of Current Approaches, Gaps, and Emerging Practices

“…When analytes do not ionize during mass spectrometric analysis, orthogonal detectors such as UV, CAD and ELSD can be useful for providing additional analyte detection and quantification. For example, the use of a multiple detector approach in LC/MS analysis can improve analyses for butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) . To reduce the effects of RF variation, the sensitivity of extractable methods can be verified at the time of the analysis …”

Characterization of synthetic dyes for environmental and forensic assessments: A chromatography and mass spectrometry approach

“…MS allows for more specificity in differentiating dyes compared to LC alone, as response wavelength and retention time may be too similar to identify what compounds are present successfully. Furthermore, MS allows for the identification of substances at very low quantities, even when matrices are present and ionization suppression could affect the detection of all species [17,75–78].…”

“…Criminals could bury bodies with clothing or pieces of textiles to hide the evidence from the scene. As a buried textile degrades, its dyes leach into the soil [78]. The degradation process of buried textiles is complex and depends on many factors, including soil type, weather conditions, and time of year.…”