2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of locally adapted mycorrhizas and rhizobacteria in plant–soil feedback systems

Abstract: Summary1. The plant-soil feedback (PSF) framework has become an important theory in plant ecology, yet many ecological and evolutionary factors that influence PSFs have yet to be fully considered. Here, we discuss the importance of local adaptation among plants and root-associated fungi and bacteria. Furthermore, we show how inclusion of the optimal resource allocation (OA) model can help predict the direction and outcome of PSFs under environmental change. 2. Plants and associated soil microbes have co-evolve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
185
2
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
(272 reference statements)
13
185
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…First, only common species from two plant functional groups (N‐fixing and non‐N‐fixing) were examined in the present study, which would only have accounted for a subset of the range of PSF present among the diverse spectrum of plant functional groups in species‐rich plant communities on these old, severely P‐impoverished soils (e.g., Lambers et al, ; Zemunik et al, ). In particular, plant functional groups associated with key below‐ground nutrient‐acquisition traits of AM, ECM, and non‐mycorrhizal cluster roots require further attention (Lekberg et al, ; Revillini et al, ; Teste et al, ; Zemunik et al, ). Second, the underlying mechanisms of how various groups of soil microorganisms (e.g., N‐fixing rhizobia, plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria, and soil‐borne pathogens) influence PSF in this study remain something of a “black box.” Third, our chronosequence approach does not allow strong inference of the causal mechanisms between the observed shifts in PSF and soil N and P availability (Walker et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, only common species from two plant functional groups (N‐fixing and non‐N‐fixing) were examined in the present study, which would only have accounted for a subset of the range of PSF present among the diverse spectrum of plant functional groups in species‐rich plant communities on these old, severely P‐impoverished soils (e.g., Lambers et al, ; Zemunik et al, ). In particular, plant functional groups associated with key below‐ground nutrient‐acquisition traits of AM, ECM, and non‐mycorrhizal cluster roots require further attention (Lekberg et al, ; Revillini et al, ; Teste et al, ; Zemunik et al, ). Second, the underlying mechanisms of how various groups of soil microorganisms (e.g., N‐fixing rhizobia, plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria, and soil‐borne pathogens) influence PSF in this study remain something of a “black box.” Third, our chronosequence approach does not allow strong inference of the causal mechanisms between the observed shifts in PSF and soil N and P availability (Walker et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal resource allocation can also influence the outcome of plant-soil feedbacks (Revillini et al 2016), and thus optimal partitioning theory predicts that plants should allocate more biomass to the organ that will alleviate resource limitation (Bloom et al 1985). Optimal resource allocation can also influence the outcome of plant-soil feedbacks (Revillini et al 2016), and thus optimal partitioning theory predicts that plants should allocate more biomass to the organ that will alleviate resource limitation (Bloom et al 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, biomass of the former plant lineage does not significantly respond to N addition, while the biomass of the latter increases (Wooliver et al, ). Thus, N deposition can induce plants to decrease C investment to these symbionts below‐ground, thereby decreasing biomass and abundance of these formerly beneficial microbial symbionts (Treseder et al, ) and weakening the plant–soil feedbacks that had been positive in low‐nutrient soils (Revillini, Gehring, & Johnson, ). Based on these patterns, subsequent co‐evolution between plants and their nutrient‐acquiring microbial symbionts should diminish under N deposition, and lower abundances of mycorrhizal symbionts should leave pools of more complex SOM intact.…”
Section: Evolution Of Plant N Usementioning
confidence: 99%