The Role of Linking Agents in the Diffusion of Health Promotion Programs

Abstract

This article examines the role of state health department dental offices as linking agents in the diffusion of an effective preventive health program, the fluoride mouthrinse program (FMRP) in public schools. The aim of this program is to prevent dental caries by a weekly mouthrinsing by elementary school students. In contrast to the traditional focus of diffusion research on characteristics of the innovation and characteristics of the adopter, this study emphasizes an ecological approach, i.e., the transmittal mechanisms for diffusion. The state dental offices are examined as linking agents, which serve as program advocates or champions for diffusing the FMRP from the national level, where it was developed, to the thousands of local school districts and schools for adoption and continued delivery. Using data from interviews with state dental directors and archival sources, a multivariate model was developed and used to explain the percent of a state's elementary schools using the mouthrinse program. The results support the key role of linking agents in disseminating effective health promotion programs into actual use. Implications are discussed for both research and practice.

Knowing about a public bicycle share program in Montreal, Canada: Are diffusion of innovation and proximity enough for equitable awareness?

“…In this regard, we believe that understanding the association between awareness of the PBSP and other indicators of active transportation amenities and use is a useful direction for future research. Other factors that might influence awareness are opinion leaders, linking agents (Monahan and Scheirer, 1988;Valente, 2010;Valente and Davis, 1999), health habits and needs (Carlfjord et al, 2010), high communication networking, and social interactions (Badilescu-Buga, 2013). Communication occurring through social interactions appears as key to widespread information (Pescosolido and Rubin, 2000;Scott and Carrington, 2011;Simmel, 1964).…”

Factors Associated with Fidelity to Substance Use Prevention Curriculum Guides in the Nation's Middle Schools

“…As specified in Figure 1, these include characteristics of (1) the organizational context in which the curriculum is implemented; (2) the implementation system, including training in the curriculum; (3) implementers of the program or curriculum; and (4) audiences targeted. School context and other organizational characteristics that have been linked to fidelity include school size and climate, 37 teacher morale, organizational support, 7,12,[38][39][40] and parental support, 41 as well as constraints in time and resources. 41,42 With regard to the implementation system, a number of studies and reviews, 12,37,43,44 as well as guides to effective school-based drug prevention curricula, 3,6 strongly emphasize the importance of training for effective implementation.…”

Motivating Public School Districts to Adopt Sun Protection Policies

“…30,32,33 In DIT terms, Sun Safe Schools was an effort by outside change agents to promote policy adoption; such efforts have been successful with schools on other health topics. 33–35 Past research suggested that senior school administrators are instrumental in adoption decisions, while mid-level administrators facilitate implementation. 36,37 Hence, district administrators were the primary target of Sun Safe Schools but program staff tried to identify and work with internal champions at any level.…”