2018
DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.05.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of lineage specifiers in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Over the last decade, multiple genomics studies have led to the identification of discrete molecular subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. A general theme has emerged that most pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be grouped into two major subtypes based on cancer cell autonomous properties: classical/pancreatic progenitor and basal-like/squamous. The classical/progenitor subtype expresses higher levels of lineage specifiers that regulate endodermal differentiation than the basal-like/ squamous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease, with the lowest 5-years survival rate of all cancers ( Siegel et al, 2021 ). Cell type infidelity seems to play an important role in PDAC initiation and progression and might even drive therapy resistance ( Collisson et al, 2011 ; Moffitt et al, 2015 ; Bailey P. et al, 2016 ; Camolotto et al, 2018 ). Here, we briefly discuss the mechanisms leading to cell fate commitment within the normal exocrine pancreas (where PDAC arises from), the role of cell infidelity in cancer progression and therapy resistance and how these concepts fit within the challenging clinical context of PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal disease, with the lowest 5-years survival rate of all cancers ( Siegel et al, 2021 ). Cell type infidelity seems to play an important role in PDAC initiation and progression and might even drive therapy resistance ( Collisson et al, 2011 ; Moffitt et al, 2015 ; Bailey P. et al, 2016 ; Camolotto et al, 2018 ). Here, we briefly discuss the mechanisms leading to cell fate commitment within the normal exocrine pancreas (where PDAC arises from), the role of cell infidelity in cancer progression and therapy resistance and how these concepts fit within the challenging clinical context of PDAC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major difference between squamous and progenitor carcinoma would be the transcription factors in endodermal development and differentiation. TGF-β and MYC were usually overexpressed among the squamous carcinoma, but not progenitor carcinoma [44]. In view of the upregulation of TGF-β among squamous carcinoma, gemcitabine treatment may down-regulate TGF-β in pancreatic tumor and resulting a better treatment outcomes achieved among the squamous carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A healthy individual will have no squamous cells in the pancreas. As compared to progenitor cells carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the pancreas is associated with poor prognosis, more aggressive with higher metastasis rate and no targeted therapy [43,44]. The major difference between squamous and progenitor carcinoma would be the transcription factors in endodermal development and differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study showed that primary and metastatic PDACs had significantly lower expression of KMT2D and loss of KMT2D promoted PDAC invasion and migration, which supports a tumor-suppressive role of KMT2D in PDAC. Loss of KMT2D also induced a gene signature closely resembling the Moffitt basal-like subtype, which confers a significantly worse prognosis compared to the classical subtype 21,45,46 . These PDAC subtypes have distinct epigenetic landscapes that drive transcriptional alterations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%