1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(97)80115-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of laparoscopy in the management of suspected pancreatic and periampullary malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
34
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield from laparoscopic assessment in identifying these patients will be dependent on both the quality of the radiological imaging and patient selection. Recent series [2,3,4,5, 22, 23]have reported resection rates in patients considered resectable on radiological assessment (number of patients actually resected/number of patients resectable on radiological assessment) of over 70%; correspondingly the yield from laparoscopy has decreased to 4–13% [2,3,4,5, 22]. In the current series (including 16% of patients with equivocal findings on contrast-enhanced computed tomography) the resection rate in patients considered resectable on radiological assessment was 68%; identification of unresectability on laparoscopic assessment of 15% of patients considered resectable on radiological assessment, data that are in keeping with other recent series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The yield from laparoscopic assessment in identifying these patients will be dependent on both the quality of the radiological imaging and patient selection. Recent series [2,3,4,5, 22, 23]have reported resection rates in patients considered resectable on radiological assessment (number of patients actually resected/number of patients resectable on radiological assessment) of over 70%; correspondingly the yield from laparoscopy has decreased to 4–13% [2,3,4,5, 22]. In the current series (including 16% of patients with equivocal findings on contrast-enhanced computed tomography) the resection rate in patients considered resectable on radiological assessment was 68%; identification of unresectability on laparoscopic assessment of 15% of patients considered resectable on radiological assessment, data that are in keeping with other recent series.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of laparoscopic assessment (laparoscopy with or without intraoperative ultrasonography) in the preoperative staging of suspected pancreatic malignancy is controversial [1,2,3,4,5,6]. An initial report [1] suggested that laparoscopy could alter the management in up to 35% of patients by the detection of occult metastatic disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the ability of laparoscopy to improve preoperative detection of resectable periampullary cancer remains to be evaluated, preliminary studies are encouraging. 21,22 Conlon and colleagues 23 were able to increase the ability to predict resectability from 53% after CT staging to 88% by adding laparoscopy. A number of studies have also shown that laparoscopic ultrasonography can be added to regular laparoscopy to enhance its accuracy in staging patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that time (1978) they reported success in detecting occult metastases in 75% of their evaluated patients who were all staged before by a CT scan [19]. Since then laparoscopy has been performed separately or in combination with a possible laparotomy [9, 12, 21, 22, 23]. …”
Section: Staging Laparoscopy: In Which Patients Should It Be Performed?mentioning
confidence: 99%