2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of language similarity in processing second language morphosyntax: Evidence from ERPs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Foucart and Frenck-Mestre (2011) found tentative evidence German learners of French show more electrophysiological sensitivity to gender errors when the French nouns have the same gender as German than when they have a different gender. This observation was later supported by Carrasco-Ortíz et al (2017), who observed a similar pattern with Spanish learners of French. Díaz et al (2016) examined Spanish learners of Basque, and found stronger electrophysiological responses to syntactic violations in structures that are common between Spanish and Basque compared to violations in structures unique to Basque.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Foucart and Frenck-Mestre (2011) found tentative evidence German learners of French show more electrophysiological sensitivity to gender errors when the French nouns have the same gender as German than when they have a different gender. This observation was later supported by Carrasco-Ortíz et al (2017), who observed a similar pattern with Spanish learners of French. Díaz et al (2016) examined Spanish learners of Basque, and found stronger electrophysiological responses to syntactic violations in structures that are common between Spanish and Basque compared to violations in structures unique to Basque.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Learning a second language (L2) can be difficult for a variety of reasons. Pedagogical context (Tagarelli et al, 2016), cognitive processing differences across learners (Ellis, 1996;Yalçın and Spada, 2016), L2 structural complexity (Pallotti, 2015;Yalçın and Spada, 2016;Housen et al, 2019), or similarity between the target L2 and the learner's first language (L1) can all conspire to affect the speed and success of L2 acquisition (Hyltenstam, 1977;Lowie and Verspoor, 2004;Foucart and Frenck-Mestre, 2011;Málek, 2013;Schepens et al, 2013;Türker, 2016;Carrasco-Ortíz et al, 2017). Similarity, in particular, is a difficult variable to examine, because it is so hard to pin down.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, although we see negative effects for both error types, negativities tend to be larger for "first-person subject + third-person verb" errors, and the largest negativities for this error type are associated with learners near the lower end of the proficiency range examined. It is thus possible that lower proficiency learners rely on qualitatively different processing mechanisms for harder dependencies (e.g., Carrasco-Ortiz et al, 2017;Osterhout et al, 2006;Tanner et al, 2014) although the small number of negative responders in our sample precludes strong conclusions. That global proficiency interacted with error type in the ERP data is consistent with the claim we made in Alemán Bañón et al (2017) that markedness impacts L2 processing without constraining it.…”
Section: L2 Processing Of Spanish Person Agreement 21mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Individuals who are well familiar with more than two languages can go about as translators and get proper government jobs. (Carrasco-Ortíz et. al, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%