2017
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-1680-4.ch006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Knowledge Management Strategies in Cooperation Agreements

Abstract: In this chapter, the role of knowledge management strategies (KMS) in cooperation agreements is analyzed in a technology-intensive company. Knowledge management in alliances implies to establish an organizational design to both explore and exploit knowledge for achieving competitive goals (for each partner). The importance of alliances for technological companies and the necessity of designing suitable KMS in alliances—in terms of objectives and goals, knowledge management tools, and support systems—are explai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous research emphasising the contribution of effective and efficient KM to organisational performance (Donate et al 2017;Naicker et al 2017), the findings of this study demonstrate that KM (recognition) and KM (implementation) were directly and positively linked to firm competitiveness. This outcome is not surprising, given the claim that KM is regarded as a critical dynamic resource for attaining competitive advantage (Jyoti et al 2013;Kiptalam et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with previous research emphasising the contribution of effective and efficient KM to organisational performance (Donate et al 2017;Naicker et al 2017), the findings of this study demonstrate that KM (recognition) and KM (implementation) were directly and positively linked to firm competitiveness. This outcome is not surprising, given the claim that KM is regarded as a critical dynamic resource for attaining competitive advantage (Jyoti et al 2013;Kiptalam et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent with previous research emphasising the contribution of effective and efficient KM to organisational performance (Donate et al 2017;Naicker et al 2017), the findings of this study demonstrate that KM (recognition) and KM (implementation) were directly and positively linked to firm competitiveness. This outcome is not surprising, given the claim that KM is regarded as a critical dynamic resource for attaining competitive advantage (Jyoti et al 2013;Kiptalam et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While previous studies have been conducted on knowledge sharing and has established the various factors that affect an individual's willingness to share knowledge, such as costs and benefits, incentive systems, extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, organization climate, and management championship (Lin 2007a(Lin , 2007bSuppiah & Sandhu 2011;Wasko & Faraj 2005), however, there is a lack of emphasis on knowledge sharing in the context of innovative behavior as a consequence of knowledge sharing influenced by ICT usage. Donate and Guadamillas (2011) and Donate et al (2017) argue that knowledge sharing is a major concern because of the recognition of the value of organizational learning in knowledge creation and innovation within an organization. In line with this, the literature reviews in this study attempt to lay the foundation for the relationship between the variables, thus, providing a basis for the research framework.…”
Section: Literature Review Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%