2023
DOI: 10.3171/2023.4.jns23123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of intracranial pressure variability as a predictor of intracranial hypertension and mortality in critically ill patients

Abstract: OBJECTIVE Intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring is a widely utilized and essential tool for tracking neurosurgical patients, but there are limitations to the use of a solely ICP-based paradigm for guiding management. It has been suggested that ICP variability (ICPV), in addition to mean ICP, may be a useful predictor of neurological outcomes, as it represents an indirect measure of intact cerebral pressure autoregulation. However, the current literature regarding the applicability of ICPV shows conflicting as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[58][59][60] The integration of ICP variability into recurrent network models has not only improved the prediction of future ICP spikes but also emerged as a strong mortality indicator. 61 As ABI management shifts toward a multimodal monitoring approach, ML is proving useful in deciphering complex patterns from multiple physiological signals. For instance, using data from the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brian Injury (BOOST) II trial, ML predicted both ICP spikes and brain tissue hypoxia with a 30-minute lead time.…”
Section: Intracranial Pressure Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[58][59][60] The integration of ICP variability into recurrent network models has not only improved the prediction of future ICP spikes but also emerged as a strong mortality indicator. 61 As ABI management shifts toward a multimodal monitoring approach, ML is proving useful in deciphering complex patterns from multiple physiological signals. For instance, using data from the Brain Tissue Oxygen Monitoring and Management in Severe Traumatic Brian Injury (BOOST) II trial, ML predicted both ICP spikes and brain tissue hypoxia with a 30-minute lead time.…”
Section: Intracranial Pressure Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%