2015
DOI: 10.1080/01932691.2015.1050728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Internal Droplet Size on Emulsion Stability and the Extraction Performance of Kraft Lignin Removal from Pulping Wastewater in Emulsion Liquid Membrane Process

Abstract: It has been discovered that the size of internal droplets in primary emulsion determines emulsion dispersion and stability in emulsion liquid membrane (ELM) process for removal of lignin from pulping wastewater. Generally, primary emulsion contains kerosene, Aliquat 336, sodium bicarbonate, as well as Span 80 as diluent, carrier, internal phase, and surfactant respectively. Hence, this study had looked into the parameters, including concentration of surfactant, carrier, and stripping agent; emulsification spee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the membrane stability decreases with further increase in the concentration of HCl solution from 0.8 to 1 M. It should be noted that at high concentrations of HCl, the decrease in emulsion stability may be due to the increased interaction between HCL and surfactant. Therefore, an increase in the concentration of the internal phase causes the osmotic swelling of the internal phase (stripping) resulting in destabilization of the emulsion [67]. The optimum concentration of the internal phase to yield a stable emulsion was found to be equal to 0.8 M.…”
Section: Effect Of Internal Phase Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, the membrane stability decreases with further increase in the concentration of HCl solution from 0.8 to 1 M. It should be noted that at high concentrations of HCl, the decrease in emulsion stability may be due to the increased interaction between HCL and surfactant. Therefore, an increase in the concentration of the internal phase causes the osmotic swelling of the internal phase (stripping) resulting in destabilization of the emulsion [67]. The optimum concentration of the internal phase to yield a stable emulsion was found to be equal to 0.8 M.…”
Section: Effect Of Internal Phase Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The emulsification speed during the preparation of the primary W/O emulsion affects the internal droplet size and emulsion stability [30,71,72]. However, in some cases it seems that emulsification speed exceeding a certain value increases the droplet size and makes the emulsion unstable [68].…”
Section: Effect Of Emulsification Speed and Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Droplet microfluidics has established itself for studying biological and biochemical systems with high throughput and low cost. By forming millions of near-identical water in oil droplets, samples are partitioned enabling in-drop directed evolution, high throughput screening, , and single-molecule or single-cell analysis. These foundational techniques rely upon the efficient compartmentalization enabled by monodisperse SE droplets, however, SE stability remains a persistent challenge . Despite the significant effort that has been devoted to developing surfactants that stabilize SE droplets during incubation, thermal cycling, reinjection, and other drop manipulations, droplet merging cannot be fully avoided. Drop coalescence is known to vary with drop size , aqueous phase composition, surfactant composition, , thermal gradients, , and shear stress . The extent of drop merging can even vary significantly between experimental replicates as shown in Figure S1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Despite the significant effort that has been devoted to developing surfactants that stabilize SE droplets during incubation, thermal cycling, reinjection, and other drop manipulations, droplet merging cannot be fully avoided. 11−13 Drop coalescence is known to vary with drop size 14,15 aqueous phase composition, 16−18 surfactant composition, 11,12 thermal gradients, 19,20 and shear stress. 21 The extent of drop merging can even vary significantly between experimental replicates 17 as shown in Figure S1.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%