2015
DOI: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1070949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of intensity in constraint-induced language therapy for people with chronic aphasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
27
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectively, these studies demonstrate the need for more research to understand variables (ie, severity, stage of recovery) that influence use-dependent learning. Additionally, recent research has called into question 44 the assumption that the neuroplasticity principle of intensity is a fundamental component of CILT. Thus, further studies that systematically manipulate neuroplasticity principles such as intensity and repetition are needed to understand the active treatment components of CILT and their effect on brain structure and function.…”
Section: Principles For Inducing Beneficial Neuroplasticity Through Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collectively, these studies demonstrate the need for more research to understand variables (ie, severity, stage of recovery) that influence use-dependent learning. Additionally, recent research has called into question 44 the assumption that the neuroplasticity principle of intensity is a fundamental component of CILT. Thus, further studies that systematically manipulate neuroplasticity principles such as intensity and repetition are needed to understand the active treatment components of CILT and their effect on brain structure and function.…”
Section: Principles For Inducing Beneficial Neuroplasticity Through Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both intensive and distributed therapy had a positive effect on word retrieval for treated items immediately post-therapy and treatment effects were maintained for 1 month post-therapy. number of studies that have previously investigated the effect of dosage-controlled, treatment intensity on word retrieval outcomes in adults with chronic aphasia (Dignam et al, 2015;Mozeiko, Coelho, & Myers, 2015;Ramsberger & Marie, 2007;Raymer et al, 2006;Sage et al, 2011). Together, the results of these studies provide evidence that a distributed therapy schedule does not reduce the efficacy of anomia therapy and that therapy outcomes for distributed treatment may be comparable, if not superior, to intensive therapy in individuals with chronic aphasia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…However, direct comparisons with equivalent treatments delivered less intensively are generally lacking (Mozeiko et al, 2015). Due to the inherent variability in aphasia severity, this research question may more appropriately be considered using a within-subjects design.…”
Section: Aphasia Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIUs/min demonstrates sensitivity to group differences, 31 stability over time, 31,63 and is recommended to document treatment-induced change, clinical decision making, and group research studies. 63 This measure has been used in treatment studies in stroke-induced aphasia, 62,[71][72][73][74] PPA, 24 and group research in traumatic brain injury. 75 Impressively, CIUs/ min corresponds to measures of social validity in aphasia outcomes research, such as listener perception and listener comfort.…”
Section: Derived Efficiency Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%