The role of institutional investors in market volatility during the subprime mortgage crisis

Tseng, Tseng-Chan; Lai, Hung-Cheng

doi:10.1080/09603107.2014.925075

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Institutional investors have been viewed in past studies (Tseng and Lai, 2014; Vo, 2016; Barinov, 2017; Ikizlerli, 2020) as a unified entity; we now concentrate on the type of institutional ownership. In light of previous studies, this study expands on conventional wisdom to consider types of institutional investors’ pressure-sensitive and pressure-insensitive.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stabilizing or destabilizing: the effect of institutional investors on stock return volatility in an emerging market

Batra,

Yadav,

Jindal

et al. 2023

MBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of institutional investors and their classes on the stock return volatility of an emerging market. The paper also determines the moderating role of firm size, crisis and turnover on such relationships. Design/methodology/approach The study covers nonfinancial companies of the Bombay Stock Exchange-100 index that are listed during the study period. The study uses fixed effects and systematic generalized method of moments estimators to look over the association between institutional investors and firms’ stock return volatility. Findings The study provides evidence that institutional investors destabilize the Indian stock market. It indicates that institutional investors do not engage in management activities; they earn short-term gains depending on information efficiency. Pressure-insensitive institutional investors have a significant positive relation with stock return volatility, while pressure-sensitive institutional investors do not. The study also reflects that pressure-sensitive institutional investors are underweighted in India, which jointly represents an insignificant nonlinear association between institutional ownership and stocks’ volatility. Furthermore, outcomes reveal that the intersection effect of the crisis, firm size and turnover is positively and significantly related to such relationships. Research limitations/implications The outcomes encourage initiatives that keep track of institutional investors in the Indian stock market. To control the destabilizing effect of pressure-insensitive institutional investors, regulators should follow strict regulations on their trading patterns. Moreover, it guides the potential researchers that they should also take into account the impact of other classes of ownership structure or what type of ownership can help in stabilizing or destabilizing the Indian stock market. Originality/value Abundant literature studies the relationship between institutional ownership and firm performance in the Indian context. From the standpoint of making management decisions, the return and volatility of stock returns are both different aspects. However, this study examines the effect of institutional ownership and its groups on the volatility of stock return using the panel data estimator, which was previously not discussed in the literature.

show abstract