2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of information on consumer sensory, hedonic and wellbeing perception of sugar-reduced products: Case study with orange/pomegranate juice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
53
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
53
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The similar acceptance behavior between apricot nectar sample with 0.07% of stevia and the one with 10% of sucrose is in agreement with what reported by Cardello et al () that highlighted that the sweet power of stevia is similar to that of a 10% sucrose solution. A similar result was reported by Reis, Alcaire, Deliza, and Ares () that highlighted that regarding sensory perception of the juices with sweeteners under blind conditions, sucralose and stevia were most similar to the juice sweetened with sugar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The similar acceptance behavior between apricot nectar sample with 0.07% of stevia and the one with 10% of sucrose is in agreement with what reported by Cardello et al () that highlighted that the sweet power of stevia is similar to that of a 10% sucrose solution. A similar result was reported by Reis, Alcaire, Deliza, and Ares () that highlighted that regarding sensory perception of the juices with sweeteners under blind conditions, sucralose and stevia were most similar to the juice sweetened with sugar.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The acceptance tends to be greater when consumers understand what they are consuming, probably because consumers feel more confident (Deliza, Rosenthal, & Silva, ). A similar higher acceptance in informed tests was observed for sugar reduced orange/pomegranate juice (Reis et al, ), protected designation of origin products (Kos Skubic, Erjavec, Ule, & Klopčič, ) and organic food (Asioli et al, ), food processing information including some benefits for consumers (Deliza et al, ; Lee et al, ), which can be considered highly positive information. On the other hand, the same scores were observed in blind/informed sensory tests when the received information did not have a strong appeal (e.g., type of meat used to prepare sausages and coppa [Meier‐Dinkel et al, ; de Andrade, Nalério, Giongo, et al, ]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The PDM was the sample that had the second highest acceptance, with scores higher (4.92–5.78) than the remaining samples except in color attribute. This high acceptance is possibly explained by the high sweetness of this sample (industrially added by sugar and noncaloric sweeteners), as Brazilians are used to drinking juice with sugar content (Reis et al, ). Additionally, high PDM acceptance can be explained by consumption habits related to the fact that it is easy to make and inexpensive, which is commonly observed for a low‐income population (Ares, Machín, Girona, Curutchet, & Giménez, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations