2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
120
5
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
9
120
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this effect is weaker in family than in non-family businesses, notably when the CEO is a family member. These findings suggest that, in family firms, even independent directors behave according to the owning family's will [45,54,55]. Consistent with these results, there is also evidence from the high-tech industry in Taiwan that board independence moderates a family business's propensity to resort to earnings management, but the effect is reversed in the presence of CEO duality [56].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this effect is weaker in family than in non-family businesses, notably when the CEO is a family member. These findings suggest that, in family firms, even independent directors behave according to the owning family's will [45,54,55]. Consistent with these results, there is also evidence from the high-tech industry in Taiwan that board independence moderates a family business's propensity to resort to earnings management, but the effect is reversed in the presence of CEO duality [56].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It points out that family control increases sustainability reporting when the family exerts a direct influence on the business, by appointing a family CEO, or by having the founder on the board; family ownership stake, per se, without family involvement on the board, negatively affects sustainability disclosure extent. Consistent with this, Cuadrado-Ballesteros et al [45] found that a higher proportion of independent directors on the board lowered the transparency of CSR disclosure in family firms. There is also empirical evidence that social and environmental disclosure in family firms is more affected by media-exposure than in non-family businesses, as they are particularly concerned with the effect of visibility on reputation [22].…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To the best of the researcher's knowledge, only Kang (2013) has investigated the link between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. However, Kang employed KLD as the indicators of corporate social performance instead of other indicators, such as GRI (Bouten et al 2011;Cuadrado-Ballesteros et al 2015). Moreover, this study has contributed in calculating the CSP measurement by using content analysis based on the GRI Indicator, which is different to other previous studies (i.e.…”
Section: Contribution Of Study Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Some researchers [36,37] found a positive connection between independent director and CSR disclosures. However, some researchers (e.g., [22,35] found a negative association between board independence and CSR disclosures.…”
Section: Board Independence and Sustainability Reportingmentioning
confidence: 99%