“…And there are difficult, although not insurmountable, challenges in communicating across the law/neuroscience disciplinary divide, as well as in carefully and properly interpreting neuroscientific evidence within the specific legal contexts in which it is offered (Jones et al, 2013b). Not surprisingly, the intersections of law and neuroscience have prompted some debate over whether we will in fact see, at the frontier edges of this new discipline, a net gain in the fair and effective administration of justice, and in what specific contexts (Greene and Cohen, 2004;Sapolsky, 2004;Morse, 2006Morse, , 2010Morse, , 2011Patel et al, 2007;Pustilnik, 2009;Brown and Murphy, 2010;Hughes, 2010;Mayberg, 2010;Morse, 2010Morse, , 2011Pardo and Patterson, 2010;Legrenzi et al, 2011;Satel and Lilienfeld, 2013). But in our view, one thing is utterly clear.…”