2014
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4049-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Using Paclitaxel in Platinum-Sensitive Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients with Microscopic Residual Disease after Cytoreduction

Abstract: The administration of HIPEC in patients in whom it is possible to achieve a CCR of the disease has not increased postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in our center. HIPEC with paclitaxel is effective in the treatment of microscopic disease in platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer patients with microscopic residual disease after cytoreduction, although with no statistically significant difference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…82,83 The temperature of the perfusate was similar in both studies, ranging between 41-C and 43-C. However, 1 study used an infusion time of 60 minutes 83 ; whereas in the second, no infusion time is reported.…”
Section: Paclitaxel Groupmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…82,83 The temperature of the perfusate was similar in both studies, ranging between 41-C and 43-C. However, 1 study used an infusion time of 60 minutes 83 ; whereas in the second, no infusion time is reported.…”
Section: Paclitaxel Groupmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, 1 study used an infusion time of 60 minutes 83 ; whereas in the second, no infusion time is reported. 82 In addition, paclitaxel was used in 2 other studies in combination with cisplatin 78 and carboplatin. 79 …”
Section: Paclitaxel Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 5 case control studies that have compared CRS and HIPEC with CRS alone [67][68][69][70][71] and all but one have shown a statistically significant benefit of CRS and HIPEC over CRS alone. These studies are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Hipec As Second Line Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant concern of HIPEC is the toxicity associated with the regimen. Prospective data published shows HIPEC to have similar toxicity to CRS followed by IV therapy [24,33]. Again, these are a limited number of studies, and further evaluation of morbidity and mortality needs to be performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%