1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-328x(95)05401-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of hydrogen bonds involving the metal atom in protonation of polyhydrides of molybdenum and tungsten of MH4(dppe)2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] Relative to the complex [Cp*FeH(dppe)] (E j = 1.36 AE 0.02), [25] which prefers to use the hydride site, hydrogen bonding has been shown to occur at the metal site for compounds with both higher basicity factors, for example, [(NP 3 )ReH 3 ] (E j = 1.46 AE 0.01) (NP 3 = N(CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 ) [10] and (PP 3 )RhH (E j = 1.40), [64] and lower ones, for example, [WH 4 (dppe) 2 ] (E j = 1.20). [65] Thus, the reasons for the preference of the metal or hydride site for hydrogen bonding are not clear at the moment. This topic definitely needs further work, both at the experimental and at the theoretical levels, greater understanding and predictive power may be attained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] Relative to the complex [Cp*FeH(dppe)] (E j = 1.36 AE 0.02), [25] which prefers to use the hydride site, hydrogen bonding has been shown to occur at the metal site for compounds with both higher basicity factors, for example, [(NP 3 )ReH 3 ] (E j = 1.46 AE 0.01) (NP 3 = N(CH 2 CH 2 PPh 2 ) 3 ) [10] and (PP 3 )RhH (E j = 1.40), [64] and lower ones, for example, [WH 4 (dppe) 2 ] (E j = 1.20). [65] Thus, the reasons for the preference of the metal or hydride site for hydrogen bonding are not clear at the moment. This topic definitely needs further work, both at the experimental and at the theoretical levels, greater understanding and predictive power may be attained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tentative assignment of all observed bands is possible on the basis of previous IR studies into the interaction between CF 3 COOH and various bases, [30][31][32] in combination with the results shown in the previous section. At 200 K the acid self-association equilibrium is shifted to the dimer, exhibiting a strong band at 1780 cm -1 with a shoulder at 1800 cm -1 (Figure 9 the position of the free CF 3 COO -anion [31,32] indicates the formation of either a weakly H-bonded contact ion pair or a solvent-separated ion pair, consistent with the relatively high polarity of CH 2 Cl 2 at low temperatures and the poor proton-donor ability of the [Cp*Mo(dppe)H 4 ] + cation. In reference to Scheme 1, this means that species V is extensively dissociated to VI or that the interaction is loose under these solvent and temperature conditions.…”
Section: In Dichloromethanementioning
confidence: 92%
“…[1,2] The kinetic preference for hydride versus metal protonation is now quite firmly established, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] though exceptions have recently been reported from studies carried out in our laboratories. [10,11] The proton transfer occurs via intermediates, for which characteristic spectroscopic signatures have been established, that contain hydrogen bonds between the proton donor and the proton acceptor (the metal center or a hydride ligand) (see Scheme 1). [12,13] The term "nonclassical hydrogen bonding" has been coined to address these interactions, while H-bonding specifically involving a hydride ligand has also been termed "dihydrogen bonding".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%