2018
DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors in Uveal Melanoma: Current Evidence

Abstract: Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular malignancy in adults, representing approximately 3% of all melanoma cases. Despite progress in chemotherapy, radiation and surgical treatment options, the prognosis and survival rates remain poor. Acetylation of histone proteins causes transcription of genes involved in cell growth, DNA replication and progression of cell cycle. Overexpression of histone deacetylases occurs in a wide spectrum of malignancies. Histone deacetylase inhibitors block the action of histo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibition of multiple HDACs, using the pan-HDAC inhibitor panobinostat was found to be superior to multiple other epigenetic inhibitors including EZH2, DOTL1, HATs, and LSD1 in enhancing the cytotoxic activity of MEK inhibition. There is already good evidence that HDAC inhibitors, including the class III inhibitor tenovin, and a number of pan-HDAC inhibitors (TSA, depsipeptide butyrate) have activity against uveal melanoma cell lines, through affects upon FAS, p21,p27, p53, c-JUN, and b-catenin expression (55)(56)(57). In cutaneous melanoma, there is also evidence that HDAC inhibition can restore sensitivity to BRAF inhibition following the onset of resistance (58)(59)(60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibition of multiple HDACs, using the pan-HDAC inhibitor panobinostat was found to be superior to multiple other epigenetic inhibitors including EZH2, DOTL1, HATs, and LSD1 in enhancing the cytotoxic activity of MEK inhibition. There is already good evidence that HDAC inhibitors, including the class III inhibitor tenovin, and a number of pan-HDAC inhibitors (TSA, depsipeptide butyrate) have activity against uveal melanoma cell lines, through affects upon FAS, p21,p27, p53, c-JUN, and b-catenin expression (55)(56)(57). In cutaneous melanoma, there is also evidence that HDAC inhibition can restore sensitivity to BRAF inhibition following the onset of resistance (58)(59)(60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, a group of enzymes involved in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression, histone deacetylases (HDACs), have generated increasing interest as potential therapeutic targets for UM [4][5][6] . HDACs remove the acetyl groups from histone lysine residues from diverse protein targets, resulting in a condensed chromatin structure that downregulates gene expression, also of tumour suppressor genes 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chidamide (HBI-8000) has been approved by the Chinese FDA for relapsed or refractory PTCL in 2015 19 (Figure 1). In vitro studies with some of these HDACIs have shown a shift of the gene expression profile from Class II (high metastatic risk) to a Class I (low metastatic risk) in UM cell cultures 5 . Moreover, it has been recognised that HDAC inhibitors such as Vorinostat (SAHA) and Panobinostat (LBH589), may be useful in adjuvant therapy in patients with high-risk Class II UM playing a role in preventing the progression of micrometastatic disease 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…resistance development in UMM. Vorinostat (a well‐known HDACi) is entering a Phase I and II clinical trials for UMM (NCT00121225 and NCT01587352) (Moschos et al , ) (Haas et al , ), and in the near future, the potential of epigenome‐targeting schemes will likely be better defined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%