2017
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010235.pub3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy surgery planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar inconclusive results hold in completed prospective studies of HFOs. In 2017, an updated Cochrane review by Gloss et al [108] investigated the clinical value of HFOs regarding decision making in epilepsy surgery. They identified only two prospective studies at the time and concluded that there is not enough evidence so far to allow for any reliable conclusions regarding the clinical value of HFOs as a marker for the SOZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar inconclusive results hold in completed prospective studies of HFOs. In 2017, an updated Cochrane review by Gloss et al [108] investigated the clinical value of HFOs regarding decision making in epilepsy surgery. They identified only two prospective studies at the time and concluded that there is not enough evidence so far to allow for any reliable conclusions regarding the clinical value of HFOs as a marker for the SOZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency Oscillations (HFOs) are believed as a potential marker for detection of epileptogenicity and predictive factor for epilepsy surgery outcome. However, a meta-analysis was able to show the significant but small relation between removal of HFO-generating brain region and outcome [62][63][64].…”
Section: Recent Advance In Epilepsy Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have not found a predictive value in the removal of these regions 84,88 and two meta-analyses of existing studies concluded that the evidence of HFOs as a predictor of surgical outcome is weak. 85,97 Furthermore, several studies have also questioned the reproducibility and reliability of HFOs as a marker. 46,87,88,98,99 First, no consensus has been reached on the exact features used to describe HFOs, because the exact underlying cellular mechanism by which they are generated remains unknown, 87 which gives rise to variability in the features chosen to define HFOs among current studies.…”
Section: Why the Source-sink Algorithm May Agree With Clinicians In Failure Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%