2012
DOI: 10.1021/jp306798p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Gold-Adsorbed Photosynthetic Reaction Centers and Redox Mediators in the Charge Transfer and Photocurrent Generation in a Bio-Photoelectrochemical Cell

Abstract: Bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers (RCs) are promising materials for solar energy harvesting, due to their high quantum efficiency. A simple approach for making a photovoltaic device is to apply solubilized RCs and charge carrier mediators to the electrolyte of an electrochemical cell. However, the adsorption of analytes on the electrodes can affect the charge transfer from RCs to the electrodes. In this work, photovoltaic devices were fabricated incorporating RCs from purple bacteria, ubiquinone-10 (Q2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This established that the RC-LH1 complex was the source of the photocurrent and that it had maintained its functional integrity despite the lack of a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) that is generally thought necessary to maintain protein integrity on bare metals. [30][31][32] The peak EQE of 1.3% at 875 nm (5 µW cm -2 irradiation) for the RS|RCLH1 electrode ( Figure 2b) was ~6-fold greater than the largest reported to date of 0.21% under 6 mW cm -2 irradiation at 875nm using a gold surface. [33] The decreased EQE at approximately 375 nm on RS ( .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This established that the RC-LH1 complex was the source of the photocurrent and that it had maintained its functional integrity despite the lack of a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) that is generally thought necessary to maintain protein integrity on bare metals. [30][31][32] The peak EQE of 1.3% at 875 nm (5 µW cm -2 irradiation) for the RS|RCLH1 electrode ( Figure 2b) was ~6-fold greater than the largest reported to date of 0.21% under 6 mW cm -2 irradiation at 875nm using a gold surface. [33] The decreased EQE at approximately 375 nm on RS ( .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…13(b)). 116 It was found that about 78% of the RCs bind preferentially to the gold 40 electrode while the rest bind to the counter electrode or float freely in the electrolyte negligibly affecting the photocurrent generation. Though the RCs were in direct contact with the gold electrode, the photocurrent was close to zero in the absence of the two electron transfer mediators, suggesting the least possibility of 45 a direct electron transfer and the importance of the mediators in achieving the electron transfer.…”
Section: Rcs Bound To Nanotubesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also interesting to note that two different approaches may coexist as in ref. 116 where the RCs are added to the electrolyte while some extent of oriented attachment to the electrode was also attempted by using mutant RCs with an 45 external Cys-group that tends to preferentially attach to the electrode. 116 Unlike other strategies, using very high light intensity may not be very useful as solar cells ultimately are to use the sunlight, which is discussed in the next section of this review.…”
Section: Where Are We Heading To?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations