2021
DOI: 10.3390/su14010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of GI Products or Local Products in the Environment—Consumer Awareness and Preferences in Albania, Bulgaria and Poland

Abstract: The main goal of this paper is to measure and compare the awareness and preferences of consumers in relation to local products in three countries: Albania, Bulgaria, and Poland. (1) Background: The analysis focused on consumer choices when presented with local products, specifically knowledge as to their environmentally friendly status. The study was evoked by the need to recognize and evaluate changes in consumer behavior as a result of the pandemic and the global challenges related to climate change and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing market for sustainable food has the potential to attract young new entrants and successors to the agricultural sector. With the beginning of the COVID pandemic the demand for sustainable food even increased in EU member states such as Poland and Bulgaria [78], where the income is below average, compared to the other member states of the EU. However, this trend conflicts with the main goal of food security as part of European policies, mainly the CAP, because on a global level the demand for agricultural products still increases quite rapidly [25].…”
Section: Trends Regarding the Food Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing market for sustainable food has the potential to attract young new entrants and successors to the agricultural sector. With the beginning of the COVID pandemic the demand for sustainable food even increased in EU member states such as Poland and Bulgaria [78], where the income is below average, compared to the other member states of the EU. However, this trend conflicts with the main goal of food security as part of European policies, mainly the CAP, because on a global level the demand for agricultural products still increases quite rapidly [25].…”
Section: Trends Regarding the Food Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concepts that help explain the correlation between quality labels and willingness to pay depend on factors such as the geographical area investigated, the consumer's residence concerning the production area, consumer demographics, GI label awareness, and product type [29]. At the same time, consumers who know the region to which the certified products refer or feel a certain attachment towards them, tend to be more optimistic about the products labeled PDO/PGI/TSG, thus also exerting a higher willingness of paying even a price premium [30][31][32]. Because consumers identify certified products with customs and heritage passed down from generation to generation, traditions cannot be exported.…”
Section: Preference Recognition and Willingness To Pay For Certified Agri-food Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because consumers identify certified products with customs and heritage passed down from generation to generation, traditions cannot be exported. These certified products outside their "area of influence" may not have the emotional attachment of experience [31,33]. Studies measuring the awareness and recognition of quality labels among European consumers conclude that consumers from Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands, but also France, Italy, Spain, Greece, Portugal have a higher likelihood of recognizing quality labels and their logos [34,35].…”
Section: Preference Recognition and Willingness To Pay For Certified Agri-food Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…198-199). Preventing imitation is, in turn, a fundamental role of intellectual property rights (World Intellectual Property Office; O'Donoghue, Scotchmer, & Thisse 1998; Maurer & Scotchmer, 2002;Anton & Yao, 2004;Granstrand, 2006;Mokyr, 2009;Holgersson, 2013;Muça, Pomianek, & Peneva, 2022). These rights give a sense of security and certainty to innovators, inventors and entrepreneurs.…”
Section: Protection Of Innovations In Enterprisesmentioning
confidence: 99%