The role of gender power relations on women’s health outcomes: evidence from a maternal health coverage survey in Simiyu region, Tanzania

Abstract

Background Gender is a crucial consideration of human rights that impacts many priority maternal health outcomes. However, gender is often only reported in relation to sex-disaggregated data in health coverage surveys. Few coverage surveys to date have integrated a more expansive set of gender-related questions and indicators, especially in low- to middle-income countries that have high levels of reported gender inequality. Using various gender-sensitive indicators, we investigated the role of gender power relations within households on women’s health outcomes in Simiyu region, Tanzania. Methods We assessed 34 questions around gender dynamics reported by men and women against 18 women’s health outcomes. We created directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to theorize the relationship between indicators, outcomes, and sociodemographic covariates. We grouped gender variables into four categories using an established gender framework: (1) women’s decision-making, (2) household labor-sharing, (3) women’s resource access, and (4) norms/beliefs. Gender indicators that were most proximate to the health outcomes in the DAG were tested using multivariate logistic regression, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Results The overall percent agreement of gender-related indicators within couples was 68.6%. The lowest couple concordance was a woman’s autonomy to decide to see family/friends without permission from her husband/partner (40.1%). A number of relationships between gender-related indicators and health outcomes emerged: questions from the decision-making domain were found to play a large role in women’s health outcomes, and condoms and contraceptive outcomes had the most robust relationship with gender indicators. Women who reported being able to make their own health decisions were 1.57 times (95% CI: 1.12, 2.20) more likely to use condoms. Women who reported that they decide how many children they had also reported high contraception use (OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.34, 2.39). Seeking care at the health facility was also associated with women’s autonomy for making major household purchases (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.13, 1.62). Conclusions The association between decision-making and other gender domains with women’s health outcomes highlights the need for heightened attention to gender dimensions of intervention coverage in maternal health. Future studies should integrate and analyze gender-sensitive questions within coverage surveys.

Women empowerment indices and utilization of health facilities during childbirth: evidence from the 2019 Sierra Leone demographic health survey

“…The study employed the gender roles framework developed by the Harvard Institute for International Development in the selection and classification of women empowerment variables [ 10 , 11 , 17 ]. The framework categorizes women’s empowerment variables into;influencing, resource and decision-making factors.…”

Protocol for a scoping review of measures and definitions of gender-based discrimination linked to health outcomes in low and middle-income countries

“…We structured the final search strategy around three elements, with each required to appear in titles or abstracts of selected studies 1 : gender discrimination-related terms, 2 health terms and 3 LMICs context-related terms. This strategy is represented in table 2 .…”

“…It is also recognised that GBD affects women’s health more broadly, by shaping resource allocation, both within and outside the household, and limiting access to health services. 3 4 In addition, besides the well-known correlation between age, poverty, education and access to medical facilities, emerging evidence suggests that the experience of GBD may contribute to the high levels of maternal mortality still observed in many regions of the world. 5 6 Thus, reducing GBD against women is postulated as an essential step towards achieving Target 3.1 of the SDGs, which demands a strong decrease in maternal mortality by 2030.…”

Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment Capacity Building of Organisations and Individuals

“…The literature also acknowledged the potential discrepancy in responses between women and men and among both on transforming power relations due to their social acceptability bias (Garrison-Desany et al, 2021). A study of gender training in NGOs that work at the grassroots examined its effectiveness in altering the equations of power, both within and in institutions, enabling women staff to discover the power within themselves and raising awareness among male staff (Murthy, 1998).…”

“…EIGE's (2016) in-depth study on gender training in the EU found that improved individual gender competence leads to positive gender mainstreaming. In the case of ASHAs (grass-roots level health workers in India), training enabled them to envision taking a more active role and increased their confidence (Garrison-Desany et al, 2021). Teachers who participated in training to promote Gender Equality in schools were less sexist and promoted autonomy to a greater extent (Kollmayer et al, 2020).…”