2009
DOI: 10.1109/msp.2009.934184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of feedback in rewritable storage channels [Lecture Notes]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [25], algorithms for parallel programming of flash memory cells were studied which were then extended in [20] as well as for the rank modulation scheme in [19]. Other works studied the programming schemes with continuousalphabet channels, see [7], [12], [13], [14], [15], [17], [18], [23] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [25], algorithms for parallel programming of flash memory cells were studied which were then extended in [20] as well as for the rank modulation scheme in [19]. Other works studied the programming schemes with continuousalphabet channels, see [7], [12], [13], [14], [15], [17], [18], [23] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the theory of rewritable channels [1][2] [3] is to provide the foundations for the study and design of techniques for the reliable storage of information on a medium that is impaired with write noise, resulting on a written value different from the one requested due to physical phenomena taking place at the time of writing. A direct motivation for this model is drawn from empirical observations that have been made on established and promising memory technologies such as FLASH [4] and Phase-Change-Memory (PCM) [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of rewritable channels [1][2] [3][4] [5] studies the tradeoff between the information storage capacity of a medium and the cost for writing into it. One of the key elements of this theory is the concept of write noise in which a write attempt results in general in a written value different from the one intended.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%