2022
DOI: 10.1080/13670050.2022.2062217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of exposure on school-aged bilingual language abilities – it depends on what you measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is striking that erroneous beliefs about bilingual development persist despite a wealth of evidence highlighting that bilingualism does not cause language delays, that minority-language speakers with NDDs can become bilinguals and that for all children, but that these children's abilities in each of their languages will be influenced by several factors such as the amount of language exposure that they receive in each language ( 25 , 65 ). Furthermore, in addition to interfering with quality of care, recommendations against these children being exposed to their native language also reduce resilience in subgroups like immigrants and refugees by leading to further loss of kinship and community tradition ( 66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is striking that erroneous beliefs about bilingual development persist despite a wealth of evidence highlighting that bilingualism does not cause language delays, that minority-language speakers with NDDs can become bilinguals and that for all children, but that these children's abilities in each of their languages will be influenced by several factors such as the amount of language exposure that they receive in each language ( 25 , 65 ). Furthermore, in addition to interfering with quality of care, recommendations against these children being exposed to their native language also reduce resilience in subgroups like immigrants and refugees by leading to further loss of kinship and community tradition ( 66 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A language status variable (bilingual/monolingual) was created based on children’s language exposure and children were assigned to one of two groups. Following Beauchamp & MacLeod ( 2022 ) and Thordardottir ( 2011 ; 2019 ), children were included in the bilingually exposed group if parents reported that they currently received at least 5% exposure to a second language. While there is no accepted cut-off for the bilingual/monolingual differentiation (and this cut-off may vary depending on the child’s age and years of exposure to a second language), findings from Beauchamp (2020) suggest that 5% was the lowest amount of second-language exposure received by children who were identified by their parents as bilingual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Bedore et al, (2012) did not find a statistically significant difference in children's input and output when language exposure information was gathered through parent questionnaires. Additionally, the use of parent questionnaires to measure language exposure is a common method in bilingualism literature (Bedore et al, 2012;Thordardottir, 2011Thordardottir, , 2015Thordardottir, , 2019Unsworth, 2016;Beauchamp et al, 2020;Beauchamp & MacLeod, 2022).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В современных исследованиях билингвальный контроль изучается в контексте активизации кон-Creative Commons by the Authors is licenced under CC-BY-NC центрации внимания на целевом языке при избегании вторжения других языков как основного когнитивного процесса, обеспечивающего преимущества билингвов в исполнительном контроле (Spinelli et al, 2022). Считается, что этот процесс включает операцию мониторинга потенциальных конфликтов между целевым и нецелевым языками, например отслеживание помех неиспользуемого языка, переключение между языками (Beauchamp & MacLeod, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified