2008
DOI: 10.1518/001872008x312206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Expertise Research and Human Factors in Capturing, Explaining, and Producing Superior Performance

Abstract: Objectives-The goal of this article is to identify some of the major trends and findings in expertise research and their connections to human factors.Background-Progress in the study of superior human performance has come from improved methods of measuring expertise and the development of better tools for revealing the mechanisms that support expert performance, such as protocol analysis and eye tracking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The definitions found in the literature usually refer to at least three components of expertise: first, a field of specialized knowledge in which expertise is observable (domain knowledge); second, an outstanding expert's performance in this field; and third, the consistency (i.e., time-lasting and reproducibility) of such a performance. The measurement of expertise usually involves comparisons (novice vs. expert), peer recognition or objective measures of efficiency, and effectiveness in domain knowledge (Charness & Tuffiash, 2008;Germain & Tejeda, 2012). In expert elicitation, a priori selection (based on publication record, group membership or résumé), co-nomination and peer suggestions are frequent (Butler, Thomas, & Pintar, 2015;EPA, 2011;Meyer & Booker, 2001;Nedeva, Georghiou, Loveridge, & Cameron, 1996), because it is quite difficult to develop tailored tests of knowledge domain effectiveness.…”
Section: Expertise and Credibility Of System Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definitions found in the literature usually refer to at least three components of expertise: first, a field of specialized knowledge in which expertise is observable (domain knowledge); second, an outstanding expert's performance in this field; and third, the consistency (i.e., time-lasting and reproducibility) of such a performance. The measurement of expertise usually involves comparisons (novice vs. expert), peer recognition or objective measures of efficiency, and effectiveness in domain knowledge (Charness & Tuffiash, 2008;Germain & Tejeda, 2012). In expert elicitation, a priori selection (based on publication record, group membership or résumé), co-nomination and peer suggestions are frequent (Butler, Thomas, & Pintar, 2015;EPA, 2011;Meyer & Booker, 2001;Nedeva, Georghiou, Loveridge, & Cameron, 1996), because it is quite difficult to develop tailored tests of knowledge domain effectiveness.…”
Section: Expertise and Credibility Of System Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acquiring expertise in medicine has been one specific interest area of expertise research. Researchers are hoping to be able, through expert performance investigations, to demonstrate the possibilities to develop skill-sensitive education for bringing novices to high levels of performance efficiently through facilitating skill acquisition (Charness & Tuffiash 2008). …”
Section: Laparoscopy -A Challenge For Surgical Resident Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, it is known that expert performance is heavily dependent on domain-specific knowledge rather than advantages of general abilities that enable experts to anticipate upcoming actions superiorly (Charness & Tuffiash 2008). The domain-specific knowledge in medicine can be broadly divided into biomedical knowledge, which forms the basic theory of medicine, and practical knowledge about treatments and the way they should be done (Van De Wiel, Boshuizen & Schmidt 2000).…”
Section: Expert Surgeon Today -Skills and Professional Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations