2019
DOI: 10.3390/educsci9020106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Evidence-Based Practice in German Special Education—State of Research and Discussion

Abstract: This paper reviews the discourse on the concept of evidence-based special education in Germany. A short overview of the current situation in regard to available evidence-based educational materials for schools in Germany and the USA is given. Critical objections on the topic within Germany will be outlined thereafter. With these in mind, a discussion on the described points of criticism will follow in closing. Overall, the concept’s essential elements, such as the social and internal evidence, are not given su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of DBDM, researchers (Schildkamp, 2019; van den Bosch et al, 2017) see formal data as foundational to important decisions that need to be made, particularly when considering the vulnerable populations for whom these decisions need to be made (e.g., students at-risk for academic or behavioral difficulties). Accordingly, decisions should not be based solely on experience and intuition (Blumenthal et al, 2019; Schildkamp et al, 2017), but should be backed up by reliable and valid data (Lai & Schildkamp, 2013). In contrast, Lai and Schildkamp (2013) argued that too narrow a definition of data use—as a mere focus on formalized data—has negative effects (Ehren & Swanborn, 2012).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of DBDM, researchers (Schildkamp, 2019; van den Bosch et al, 2017) see formal data as foundational to important decisions that need to be made, particularly when considering the vulnerable populations for whom these decisions need to be made (e.g., students at-risk for academic or behavioral difficulties). Accordingly, decisions should not be based solely on experience and intuition (Blumenthal et al, 2019; Schildkamp et al, 2017), but should be backed up by reliable and valid data (Lai & Schildkamp, 2013). In contrast, Lai and Schildkamp (2013) argued that too narrow a definition of data use—as a mere focus on formalized data—has negative effects (Ehren & Swanborn, 2012).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this approach is to map and document learning processes to detect learning deficits as early as possible, to draw conclusions about effective pedagogical interventions and to implement data-based decisions. Progress monitoring is thus an essential element of school-based prevention of learning disorders in Germany (Hartke, 2005;Huber & Grosche, 2012;Kretschmann, 2009) and also forms a basis for evidence-based pedagogical action in individual cases (Blumenthal et al, 2019).…”
Section: Progress Monitoring Of Academic Skills With Curriculum-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%