The role of ethics in science: a systematic literature review from the first wave of COVID-19

Abstract

This paper proposes a systematic literature review on ethics and CoviD-19, aiming to understand the impact and the perception of the pandemic during the first wave (January-June 2020) and the consequences one year later. PubMed was systematically searched up May 2020 to identify studies that took into consideration various ethical issues that have been arising from the Covid-19 outbreak. The eligibility of the papers was determined by two authors, who screened the results mediated by a third author. In order to facilitate the screening, the titles were divided into five sub-thematic macro-areas, namely allocation, policy, specialist, clinical trials, and technology and, when possible, per geographical area. Specifically, a posteriori, we decided to focus on the papers referring to policies and technology, as they highlighted ethical issues that are not overused and worthy of particular attention. Thus, 38 studies out of 233 met our inclusion criteria and were fully analysed. Accordingly, this review touches on themes such as fairness, equity, transparency of information, the duty of care, racial disparities, the marginalisation of the poor, and privacy and ethical concerns. Overall, it was found that despite the increased awareness of interdisciplinarity and the essential reference to ethics, many scientific articles use it with little competence, considering it only a "humanitarian" enrichment. In fact, as we understand, reflecting a year after the outbreak of the pandemic, although Covid-19 is leading scientists to increasingly recognise the importance of ethical issues, there is still a lot of confusion that could be helped by establishing international guidelines to act as a moral compass in times of crisis.

Clearing the Fog: A Scoping Literature Review on the Ethical Issues Surrounding Artificial Intelligence-Based Medical Devices

“…This specific project is the natural continuation of previous works, in which we have already described how the word "ethics" is currently widely (ab)used in scientific texts, but without real competence, almost as if it were a "humanitarian embellishment" [33,34]. One of the most recent consequences of this is the publication of numerous articles about COVID-19 that were not scientifically sound and were then retracted [33,34].…”

Research integrity in randomized clinical trials: A scoping umbrella review

“…The full text of 183 citations was obtained for eligibility assessment (Figure 1). A total of 55 reviews 5,23–76 were included in the final appraisal. Only four of them included meta‐analysis 30,53,69,74 .…”

Ethics and Biomedical Engineering for Wellbeing: a cocreation study for informing the design of a remote service of monitoring and support

“…In conclusion a deep interconnection between ethics and biomedical engineering emerged, both because it is essential for modern health technology design and because the loose concept of wellbeing represents itself the ideal topic for interdisciplinary researches (44,45).…”