2022
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.862210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of ERBB Signaling Pathway-Related Genes in Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma and Establishing a Prognostic Risk Assessment Model for Patients

Abstract: Objective: We aimed to investigate the potential role of ERBB signaling pathway–related genes in kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) and establish a new predictive risk model using various bioinformatics methods.Methods: We downloaded the KIRC dataset and clinicopathological information from The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Univariate Cox analysis was used to identify essential genes significantly associated with KIRC progression. Next, we used the STRING website to construct a protein–protein interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We collected 101 signatures in KIRC involving various biological pathways. These models are rarely applied in clinical practice and rarely verified by external data sets; alternatively, the validation performance of the external data sets is poor (45)(46)(47)(48). The generalization and applicability of these signatures are poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected 101 signatures in KIRC involving various biological pathways. These models are rarely applied in clinical practice and rarely verified by external data sets; alternatively, the validation performance of the external data sets is poor (45)(46)(47)(48). The generalization and applicability of these signatures are poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drug information was obtained from the Genomics of Cancer Drug Sensitivity (GDSC) website ( 30 ) ( ), and the R package ‘pRRophetic’ ( 31 ) was used to predict IC 50 values to explore possible clinical adjuvant drugs for the treatment of grade II–III glioma ( ). To determine if the risk model was associated with immunotherapy, the expression levels of key genes in the two groups of immune checkpoints were compared.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%