2000
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2000.15.5.501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of E-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical significance of E-cadherin expression in lung cancer. E-cadherin expression was detected by immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal antibody (HECD-1). Strongly positive (++) E-cadherin tumors were classified as a type of preserved E-cadherin expression (Pr type), while the others (+, - tumors) were classified as a type of reduced E-cadherin expression (Rd type). The frequency of Pr type in squamous cell carcinomas (59.0%) was higher than Rd type. However, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several transcription factors such as Slug, Snail, are normally considered repressors for E-cadherin [36,39,40,41]. In A549 cells, the knockdown of RhoGDI2 significantly decreased the expression of E-cadherin, whereas overexpressing RhoGDI2 increased the expression of E-cadherin (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several transcription factors such as Slug, Snail, are normally considered repressors for E-cadherin [36,39,40,41]. In A549 cells, the knockdown of RhoGDI2 significantly decreased the expression of E-cadherin, whereas overexpressing RhoGDI2 increased the expression of E-cadherin (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Down-regulation of E-cadherin, a repressor of metastasis, is considered as the hallmark of EMT in cancer [36,37,38]. Several transcription factors such as Slug, Snail, are normally considered repressors for E-cadherin [36,39,40,41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike resistant cells, NSCLC cell lines that are highly sensitive to EGFR TKIs retain moderate to high levels of E-cadherin (Yauch et al, 2005;Soltermann et al, 2008;Kakihana et al, 2009). Moreover, loss of E-cadherin is associated with poor prognosis and is a major contributor to the early mortalities in NSCLC patients (Lim et al, 2000;Thompson et al, 2005;Yauch et al, 2005;Witta et al, 2006;Frederick et al, 2007;Soltermann et al, 2008). In NSCLC cell lines, E-cadherin expression is modulated through two main signaling pathways, namely b-catenin and zinc finger proteins, including transcriptional repressors Snail, Slug, Zeb1, and SIP1 (Zeb2) (Postigo and Dean, 1999;Ohira et al, 2003;Peinado et al, 2004;Witta et al, 2006;Kakihana et al, 2009;Schmalhofer et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is primarily attributed to the early metastatic spread of the disease within the lung and to distant organs, which involves epithelial-tomesenchymal transition (EMT) of lung cancer cells including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells (Denlinger et al, 2010). NSCLC cells differ widely in their basal level of E-cadherin, which is an epithelial marker and responsible for the "integrity of the cell" by maintaining cell polarity, cell shape, and cell-cell contact (Lim et al, 2000;Bremnes et al, 2002;Chaffer and Weinberg, 2011). The differential expression of E-cadherin in NSCLC cell lines is due to its epigenetic silencing via deacetylation-and methylation-related events regulated by epigenetic enzymes, e.g., histone deacetylases (HDACs) and DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) that deacetylate histones and methylate DNA, respectively (Johnstone, 2002;Jones and Baylin, 2002;Belinsky, 2004;Witta et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%