The suitability of newly developed non-promoted and ceria-promoted palladium−rhodium
automotive catalysts for the exhaust gas control of a hybrid drive system has been tested by
light-off experiments with steady and cycling feed stoichiometry, and pulsed-flow operation. The
dynamic behavior of the honeycomb-type catalysts has been compared to the performance of
standard honeycomb platinum−rhodium catalysts. Light-off tests carried out in the range 150−500 °C indicated significant differences in the conversion of NO
x
, CO, and hydrocarbons during
warm-up, depending on the catalyst composition and whether λ-cycling was applied or not.
Appropriate λ-cycling substantially improved the behavior of all catalysts in the lower light-off
region. At higher temperatures cycling afforded lower conversions of all target components. Under
pulsed-flow operation with an air pulse preceding the exhaust pulse (filling of the cylinder with
air), asymmetric λ-cycling with longer rich half-cycles resulted in CO and HC conversions as
well as N2 yields similar to or higher than those without an air pulse for the ceria-promoted
catalysts. The catalytic tests suggest that ceria-promoted palladium is competitive to Pt−Rh−Ce in a hybrid vehicle application.