2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-016-3582-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of drought- and disturbance-mediated competition in shaping community responses to varied environments

Abstract: By altering the strength of intra- and interspecific competition, droughts may reshape plant communities. Furthermore, species may respond differently to drought when other influences, such as herbivory, are considered. To explore this relationship, we conducted a greenhouse experiment measuring responses to inter- and intraspecific competition for two grasses, Schedonorus arundinaceus and Paspalum dilatatum, while varying water availability and simulating herbivory via clipping. We then parameterized populati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, we can better understand the processes shaping invader success and ultimately the patterns of diversity by considering the simultaneous effects of many factors on the key demographic rates of species (i.e., fitness landscapes). The interaction we found between the environment and functional diversity not only supports findings from simpler, low‐diversity experiments (Hart & Marshall, ; Loughnan & Gilbert, ; Napier et al, ), it emphasizes the need for joint and simultaneous consideration of biotic and abiotic drivers of community assembly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, we can better understand the processes shaping invader success and ultimately the patterns of diversity by considering the simultaneous effects of many factors on the key demographic rates of species (i.e., fitness landscapes). The interaction we found between the environment and functional diversity not only supports findings from simpler, low‐diversity experiments (Hart & Marshall, ; Loughnan & Gilbert, ; Napier et al, ), it emphasizes the need for joint and simultaneous consideration of biotic and abiotic drivers of community assembly.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In our study, communities with high functional diversity conferred low invasion success, but this effect was more pronounced when abiotic conditions were harsh (low macronutrient availability and low soil moisture). This result contradicts many classic models that posit that competition is reduced in stressful environments, but is consistent with recent theory and experiments (e.g., Hart & Marshall, ; Napier, Mordecai, & Heckman, ). Intuitively, although species may be able to survive harsh environmental conditions or high competition, the combination of these stressors can lead to disproportionately high mortality.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Drought has been reported to intensify the responses of plant species to defoliation (Chen et al., ; Heitschmidt, Klement, & Haferkamp, ). Meanwhile, defoliation also may weaken the negative impact of drought stress through reducing the importance of water availability (Napier, Mordecai, & Heckman, ). Our results showed that clipping led to a drastic decline in the R/S ratio of the native grasses, which may be an important emergency mechanism of native plants to damage by allocating the photosynthesis carbon from root system to new shoots and leaves of compensatory growth (Mokany, Raison, & Prokushkin, ; Zhao, Chen, & Lin, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Especially in the core areas of the afforestation and reforestation projects, an increase of 20-80% in vegetation could lead to a reduction of 9-27% in water yield under lasting and intensifying drought conditions. The reason was that tree species have high water use efficiency but low maximal rates of photosynthesis for maintaining growth under these drought conditions, leading to water consumption and thereby water yield reduction [54,55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%