2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2005.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of DNA response elements as allosteric modulators of steroid receptor function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the effects of sumoylation of the AR-NTD and the role of the polyglutamine stretch in the AR-NTD or NTD-LBD interaction are strikingly different for AR interacting with selective versus nonselective DNA motifs (26)(27)(28). These effects are examples of allosteric influences of the DNA on the functioning of nuclear receptors or transcription factors, similar to what has been described before for the AR (29) and GR (30,31).…”
Section: In Vitro Confirmation Of a Direct Effect Of The Zinc-finger mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…For example, the effects of sumoylation of the AR-NTD and the role of the polyglutamine stretch in the AR-NTD or NTD-LBD interaction are strikingly different for AR interacting with selective versus nonselective DNA motifs (26)(27)(28). These effects are examples of allosteric influences of the DNA on the functioning of nuclear receptors or transcription factors, similar to what has been described before for the AR (29) and GR (30,31).…”
Section: In Vitro Confirmation Of a Direct Effect Of The Zinc-finger mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…However, the large size of the mammalian genomes and the general need for more sophisticated control systems to regulate very large numbers of interacting genes require mammalian cells to use rather elaborate control elements to regulate gene transcription. For example, regulation of expression of individual human genes is often controlled by several sets of cis-acting regulatory elements, including promoters, enhancers (Martin 2001), silencers (Pozzoli and Sironi 2005;Boyer et al 2006), insulators (Bell et al 2001;Kuhn and Geyer 2003), and response elements (Geserick et al 2005). In concert with chromatin remodeling, histone modifications such as acetylation and methylation also play an important role in the transcriptional regulatory process (Berger 2002;Turner 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c The change of dynamics can increase the affinity for the other ligand. d Mutations lead to allosteric diseases by stabilizing an active or inactive conformation and influencing the binding of ligands, signal transmission, and gene expression of the bound transcription factor, more than simply as a docking site for transcription factors [33][34][35]. Recently, a single-molecule study showed that the binding affinity of a second protein separated from the first protein was altered, when a DNA molecule was deformed by specific binding of a protein [36].…”
Section: The Role Of Allosterymentioning
confidence: 99%