2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/infcomw.2015.7179440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of data cap in two-part pricing under market competition

Abstract: Internet services are traditionally priced at flat rates; however, many Internet service providers (lSPs) have recently shifted towards two-part tariffs where a data cap is imposed to restrain data demand from heavy users and usage over the data cap is charged based on a per-unit fee. Although two-part tariffs could generally increase the revenue for ISPs, the role of data cap and its optimal pricing structures are not well understood. In this paper, we study the impact of data cap on the optimal two-part pric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If q I < q 0 and ρ(u, q I ) > g I and p I g I − f I ≤ p I ρ(u, q 0 ), for any user type φ = (u, v), ∀v < p I , it satisfies that y * (φ, θ I , q I ) = g I and y * (φ, θI , q I ) = ρ(u, q I ) by Equation ( 4). Thus we have that π y * (φ, θ I , q I ), v, θ I = vg I − f I ≤ p I g I − f I ≤ vρ(u, q 0 ) and π y * (φ, θI , q I ), v, θI = vρ(u, q I ) − f I − ρ(u, q I ) − g I p I ≤ vρ(u, q I ) − p I ρ(u, q I ) + p I ρ(u, q 0 ) ≤ vρ(u, q 0 ) by Equation (2). It implies that the user type φ = (u, v), ∀v < p I would not choose the ISP no matter it adopts the pricing strategy θ I or θI .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…If q I < q 0 and ρ(u, q I ) > g I and p I g I − f I ≤ p I ρ(u, q 0 ), for any user type φ = (u, v), ∀v < p I , it satisfies that y * (φ, θ I , q I ) = g I and y * (φ, θI , q I ) = ρ(u, q I ) by Equation ( 4). Thus we have that π y * (φ, θ I , q I ), v, θ I = vg I − f I ≤ p I g I − f I ≤ vρ(u, q 0 ) and π y * (φ, θI , q I ), v, θI = vρ(u, q I ) − f I − ρ(u, q I ) − g I p I ≤ vρ(u, q I ) − p I ρ(u, q I ) + p I ρ(u, q 0 ) ≤ vρ(u, q 0 ) by Equation (2). It implies that the user type φ = (u, v), ∀v < p I would not choose the ISP no matter it adopts the pricing strategy θ I or θI .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…9. According to [26], [27], [28], a consumer usually chooses a data plan with monthly data cap larger than his average consumption. Period of data plan helps an SP to manage its network capacity, because an SP should make sure a corresponding network capacity is prepared during the whole period in case that the consumers consume all data quota for the whole period in a very short time.…”
Section: Discrete-consumer-typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solve the problem: max t k P k , where the optimal point tk can be obtained from (28) If the period assignments obtained are not feasible, using Algorithm 1 to adjust infeasible sub-sequences into feasible sub-sequences (the definition of infeasible sub-sequence is in Definition 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by Equation (2). It implies that the user type φ = (u, v), ∀v < p I would not choose the ISP no matter it adopts the pricing strategy θ I orθ I .…”
Section: Proof Of Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%