Abstract:This study aims to analyze the role of cross-cultural country differences during a global pandemic. Based on country cultural dimensions and country economic indicators, the research proposes specific policies that might prove of value in order to manage and better respond to present and future critical events such as the 2020 SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The methodology is based on multivariate analysis for the first set of countries and crosscountry comparative analysis for the second set of countries. Research resu… Show more
“….the rich complex of meanings, beliefs, practices, symbols, norms, and values prevalent among people in a society." Studies show that during collective crises people tend to apply behaviors that are within the realms of familiar and already available collective options (Ibanez and Sisodia, 2020;Roy, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that countries, as cultural units ( Schwartz, 2006 ), are distinguished from one another by their residents’ ways of reacting and coping, with certain cultural features acting as moderating factors to the variability in the adaptiveness of response ( Guan et al, 2020 ). Schwartz (2006 , p.138) defines culture as “…the rich complex of meanings, beliefs, practices, symbols, norms, and values prevalent among people in a society.” Studies show that during collective crises people tend to apply behaviors that are within the realms of familiar and already available collective options ( Ibanez and Sisodia, 2020 ; Roy, 2020 ).…”
This study aimed to examine how anxiety related to different styles of coping during the COVID-19 pandemic and how these relationships were moderated by the cultural orientations of individualism/collectivism and a person’s sense of meaning in life. A sample of 849 participants from Georgia completed an online survey during the final stage of lockdown. To measure the main variables, we used the State Anxiety Inventory, the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale, the Meaning of Life Questionnaire, the COVID-19 Worry Scale, and the Ways of Coping Scale tailored to COVID-19 pandemic. The latter measured rational coping via the subscales of information accessing/processing and action-planning coping, and affective coping – via the subscales of passive-submissive and avoidant coping. Results suggested that anxiety positively predicted both affective coping styles and negatively predicted the action-planning coping style, while COVID-19 worry predicted all coping styles; presence of meaning in life positively predicted both rational coping styles and negatively predicted the avoidant coping style, while search for meaning positively predicted all coping styles; individualism negatively predicted the passive-submissive style and positively predicted the action-planning style, whereas collectivism predicted all coping styles; furthermore, individualism and collectivism moderated the link between anxiety and the passive-submissive coping style, presence of meaning in life moderated the link between anxiety and avoidant coping style, while search for meaning in life moderated the link between anxiety and the action-planning coping style. Overall, the findings enrich the cultural transactional theory of stress and coping, and generate insights for the culture-sensitive approach to the meaning in life. The results were conceptualized vis-a-vis Georgia’s intermediate position between clear-cut individualism and clear-cut collectivism.
“….the rich complex of meanings, beliefs, practices, symbols, norms, and values prevalent among people in a society." Studies show that during collective crises people tend to apply behaviors that are within the realms of familiar and already available collective options (Ibanez and Sisodia, 2020;Roy, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that countries, as cultural units ( Schwartz, 2006 ), are distinguished from one another by their residents’ ways of reacting and coping, with certain cultural features acting as moderating factors to the variability in the adaptiveness of response ( Guan et al, 2020 ). Schwartz (2006 , p.138) defines culture as “…the rich complex of meanings, beliefs, practices, symbols, norms, and values prevalent among people in a society.” Studies show that during collective crises people tend to apply behaviors that are within the realms of familiar and already available collective options ( Ibanez and Sisodia, 2020 ; Roy, 2020 ).…”
This study aimed to examine how anxiety related to different styles of coping during the COVID-19 pandemic and how these relationships were moderated by the cultural orientations of individualism/collectivism and a person’s sense of meaning in life. A sample of 849 participants from Georgia completed an online survey during the final stage of lockdown. To measure the main variables, we used the State Anxiety Inventory, the Horizontal and Vertical Individualism and Collectivism Scale, the Meaning of Life Questionnaire, the COVID-19 Worry Scale, and the Ways of Coping Scale tailored to COVID-19 pandemic. The latter measured rational coping via the subscales of information accessing/processing and action-planning coping, and affective coping – via the subscales of passive-submissive and avoidant coping. Results suggested that anxiety positively predicted both affective coping styles and negatively predicted the action-planning coping style, while COVID-19 worry predicted all coping styles; presence of meaning in life positively predicted both rational coping styles and negatively predicted the avoidant coping style, while search for meaning positively predicted all coping styles; individualism negatively predicted the passive-submissive style and positively predicted the action-planning style, whereas collectivism predicted all coping styles; furthermore, individualism and collectivism moderated the link between anxiety and the passive-submissive coping style, presence of meaning in life moderated the link between anxiety and avoidant coping style, while search for meaning in life moderated the link between anxiety and the action-planning coping style. Overall, the findings enrich the cultural transactional theory of stress and coping, and generate insights for the culture-sensitive approach to the meaning in life. The results were conceptualized vis-a-vis Georgia’s intermediate position between clear-cut individualism and clear-cut collectivism.
“…In this paper, we include the implementation of NPIs at the national level as features (ie, independent variables) in predicting the national growth of the number of confirmed infection cases. Based on recent studies that identify cultural dimensions as having influence in the effectiveness of NPIs [ 17 - 19 ], we also incorporate cultural dimensions as features. Prior work has focused on NPI variations in different regions of specific countries [ 2 , 5 , 6 , 20 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research has also linked the effect of cultural dimensions in responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies suggest that cultural dimensions may affect individual and collective behavior [ 53 - 57 ] and the effectiveness of NPIs [ 17 - 19 ], and that cultural dimensions should be considered when implementing NPIs [ 17 ]. Although these studies identify the importance of cultural dimensions in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic, to our knowledge, this work is the first to complement cultural dimensions with NPIs to forecast future COVID-19 infection growth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recognize that various cultural dimension models exist, such as the six Hofstede cultural dimensions [ 58 ], Global Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness (GLOBE) [ 59 ], and the Cultural Value Scale (CVSCALE) [ 60 ], and that each model has their advocates and criticisms [ 61 ]. In this work, we selected the 2015 edition of the Hofstede model [ 62 ] due to the relevance of its cultural dimensions in the mentioned studies [ 17 - 19 , 55 - 57 ].…”
Background
National governments worldwide have implemented nonpharmaceutical interventions to control the COVID-19 pandemic and mitigate its effects.
Objective
The aim of this study was to investigate the prediction of future daily national confirmed COVID-19 infection growth—the percentage change in total cumulative cases—across 14 days for 114 countries using nonpharmaceutical intervention metrics and cultural dimension metrics, which are indicative of specific national sociocultural norms.
Methods
We combined the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker data set, Hofstede cultural dimensions, and daily reported COVID-19 infection case numbers to train and evaluate five non–time series machine learning models in predicting confirmed infection growth. We used three validation methods—in-distribution, out-of-distribution, and country-based cross-validation—for the evaluation, each of which was applicable to a different use case of the models.
Results
Our results demonstrate high
R
2
values between the labels and predictions for the in-distribution method (0.959) and moderate
R
2
values for the out-of-distribution and country-based cross-validation methods (0.513 and 0.574, respectively) using random forest and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) regression. Although these models may be used to predict confirmed infection growth, the differing accuracies obtained from the three tasks suggest a strong influence of the use case.
Conclusions
This work provides new considerations in using machine learning techniques with nonpharmaceutical interventions and cultural dimensions as metrics to predict the national growth of confirmed COVID-19 infections.
As early as two months into the COVID‐19 pandemic, popular media started reporting that women leaders, compared to men leaders, were managing COVID‐19 better. This paper empirically examines the impact of women leaders in managing pandemic health outcomes one year after the onset of the pandemic. Further, we consider leader effectiveness within the context of country culture. We find that women's leadership is indeed associated with better containment of the pandemic. We also find that certain country‐level cultural traits play a significant role in pandemic outcomes. More hierarchical societies experience higher COVID‐19 cases and death. Individualistic cultures and masculine cultures are associated with more deaths from the pandemic. Some cultural traits modulate women's ability to manage COVID‐19. Our findings have implications for health policy and provide rationale for promoting gender equity in political leadership.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.