The Role of Culture in Research Misconduct

Davis, Mark S.

doi:10.4324/9781315244426-30

Cited by 7 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An assumption was reached regarding how behaviour modification and adherence are related to the holding of religious principles, which would be the most relevant variable to the research misconduct in particular (Vieno, Nation, Perkins, & Santinello, 2007). Different cultures have benefited from religion for many centuries (Davis, 2003).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Just as it is hard to ascertain causality in this study, it is important to assume that something regarding this study setting exists, which makes it different from its contemporaries. It is not an entirely stretched one to ascertain that something regarding the setting made them encounter less bullying as opposed to other schools with the same makeup and size (Davis, 2003; Hugen & Venema, 2009; Parboteeah, Hoegl, & Cullen, 2008). Probably, it is the actual values that meant the Islamic religion of the school has assisted in viably getting rid of research misconduct nowadays (Parboteeah et al, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Religiosity and perceptions about research misconduct among graduate nursing students

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Religiosity and perceptions about research misconduct among graduate nursing students

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Abbott 1983;Anderson et al 1994Anderson et al , 2013Braxton and Bayer 1996;Chung 2015;Davis 2013;Davis et al 2007;Scholossberger 2015). In these studies, professional ethics is a dual-dimensional concept, including both an occupational and an individual level of analysis (Abbott 1983).…”

Section: Conceptualization Of Scientific Ethicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Specifically, in for-profit occupations, such as finance, accounting, and business, scholars find that, compared with their men colleagues, women are less likely to engage in unethical behavior-such as using shortcuts for estimating a method or inappropriately claiming an extra travel expense-and are less tolerant of professional misconduct (Adam 2000;Anderson et al 2013;Betz et al 1989;Davis 2013;Fox and Braxton 1994). Expanding on previous scholarship on gender and ethics, we investigate the relationship between gender and science ethics in academic physics-a discipline that has a particularly low proportion of women (Ecklund and Lincoln, 2016)-through listening to physicists' own voices.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Gendered Approach to Science Ethics for US and UK Physicists

Ecklund

2016

Sci Eng Ethics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some research indicates that women professionals-when compared to men-may be more ethical in the workplace. Existing literature that discusses gender and ethics is confined to the for-profit business sector and primarily to a US context. In particular, there is little attention paid to gender and ethics in science professions in a global context. This represents a significant gap, as science is a rapidly growing and global professional sector, as well as one with ethically ambiguous areas. Adopting an international comparative perspective, this paper relies on 121 semi-structured interviews with US and UK academic physicists to examine how physicists perceive the impact of gender on science ethics. Findings indicate that some US and UK physicists believe that female scientists handle ethical issues within science in a feminine way whereas their male colleagues approach ethics in a masculine way. Some of these physicists further claim that these different approaches to science ethics lead to male and female scientists' different levels of competitiveness in academic physics. In both the US and the UK, there are "gender-blind" physicists, who do not think gender is related to professional ethics. Relying on physicists' nuanced descriptions this paper contributes to the current understanding of gender and science and engineering ethics.

show abstract

“…6 There are several factors responsible for plagiarism in research like insufficient sensitization in research integrity and code of ethics, lack of focus on developing research especially writing skills, high degree of tolerance or lack of stringent rules and regulations in misconduct, no institutional policies specific to detect and prevent plagiarism, lack of awareness towards use of plagiarism detecting software, rampant corruption in professional growth and opportunities and inappropriate criteria of quantity of publications in career growth and promotions. [7][8][9][10] Therefore, removal of plagiarism is difficult task till comprehensive policy involving all sectors of healthcare and research are not frame.…”

Section: Plagiarism In Healthcare Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%