1981
DOI: 10.2307/255831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Culture in Comparative Management: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chinese firms may have decided to deal with those core TCE concerns through means other than formal contracts. Research on emerging markets should therefore consider important institutional factors that may draw a theoretical boundary to the TCE framework (Chen et al, 2002;Hoskisson et al, 2000;Kelly and Worthley, 1981;Peng and Heath, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chinese firms may have decided to deal with those core TCE concerns through means other than formal contracts. Research on emerging markets should therefore consider important institutional factors that may draw a theoretical boundary to the TCE framework (Chen et al, 2002;Hoskisson et al, 2000;Kelly and Worthley, 1981;Peng and Heath, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations are either dated (Beer/Gery 1972, Jurgensen 1978, Kelly/Worthley 1981, Nealey 1963, 1964, in which reward preferences are treated as static states (Pearson/Chatterjee 1999), or have been limited to the study of preferences for financial rewards and pay systems (Fay/Thompson 2001, Hempel 1998, Lowe et al 2002 and non-financial job facets (Harpaz 1990), or to a particular employee group in isolation (Harvey 1993, Pennings 1993. Non-financial rewards, especially intrinsic types, have on the whole been excluded from the research agenda.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method used in this study is somewhat comparable with Kelly and Worthly's (1981) measurement of similarities and differences in the managerial attitudes of Japanese, Japanese-American and Caucasian-American managers. However, the purpose of their study was to isolate the role of culture to test its relationship to managerial attitudes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%