2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2016.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of crossover operator in evolutionary-based approach to the problem of genetic code optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this consideration, their results also indicate that the canonical genetic code is slightly better optimized with respect to not using the entropy term. Also, BlaŻej et al [27], inspired by our work with the adapted GA [23], analyzed the effectiveness of using various combinations of mutation and crossover probabilities under three models of the genetic code, assuming different restrictions on its structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this consideration, their results also indicate that the canonical genetic code is slightly better optimized with respect to not using the entropy term. Also, BlaŻej et al [27], inspired by our work with the adapted GA [23], analyzed the effectiveness of using various combinations of mutation and crossover probabilities under three models of the genetic code, assuming different restrictions on its structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the standard genetic code does not seem to be fully optimized to minimize the 428 effects of mutations or translational errors because much better codes can be 429 found [B lażej et al, 2016, Novozhilov et al, 2007, Santos et al, 2011 Monteagudo, 2017], other factors must have taken part in shaping its structure as well. 431 The addition of subsequent amino acids into the standard code could have proceeded 432 according to their relationships in biosynthetic pathways as claims the co-evolution 433 theory [Di Giulio, 1997, Di Giulio and Medugno, 1999, Di Giulio, 2004 2008, Wong, 1975, Wong et al, 2016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would appear to be important since one without the other may not be extremely useful. High construction levels are accomplished at the expense of survival (e.g., mutation rate 0.5), while good survival is at the expense of construction (e.g., mutation rate 0.01) [11,12]. In our study, we get the highly constructive results with 0.25 to 0.3 mutation rates.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Błażej et al [11] mentioned that it has never been theoretically shown that mutation is in some sense less powerful than the crossover and vice versa. Mutation serves to create random diversity in the population while crossover serves as an accelerator that promotes emergent behavior from components [11,12]. The metaissue, then, is the relative importance of diversity and construction.…”
Section: Genetic Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation